Demographics details for Granite bay, CA vs Southfield, MI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Granite bay, CA vs Southfield, MI.
Data | Granite bay | Southfield |
---|---|---|
Population | 22,180 | 75,431 |
Median Age | 47.7 years | 42.1 years |
Median Income | $177,803 | $63,980 |
Married Families | 54.0% | 31.0% |
Poverty Level | 2% | 13% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 6.2 |
Population Comparison: Granite bay vs Southfield
- The population in Southfield is higher at 75,431, compared to 22,180 in Granite bay.
- Residents in Granite bay have a higher median age of 47.7 years compared to 42.1 years in Southfield.
- Granite bay has a higher median income of $177,803 compared to $63,980 in Southfield.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Granite bay at 54.0% compared to 31.0% in Southfield.
- The poverty level is higher in Southfield at 13%, compared to 2% in Granite bay.
- Southfield has a higher unemployment rate at 6.2% compared to 4.2% in Granite bay.
Demographics
Demographics Granite bay vs Southfield provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Granite bay | Southfield |
---|---|---|
Black | 3 | 66 |
White | 74 | 23 |
Asian | 9 | 2 |
Hispanic | 9 | 2 |
Two or More Races | 5 | 7 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Granite bay vs Southfield
- In Southfield, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 66% compared to 3% in Granite bay.
- Granite bay has a higher percentage of White residents at 74% compared to 23% in Southfield.
- The Asian population is larger in Granite bay at 9% compared to 2% in Southfield.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Granite bay at 9% compared to 2% in Southfield.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Southfield at 7%, compared to 5% in Granite bay.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Granite bay and Southfield at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Granite bay | Southfield |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 14.1% | 15.4% |
Physical Health Not Good | 8.1% | 9.9% |
Depression | 18.9% | 17.6% |
Smoking | 8.6% | 14.8% |
Binge Drinking | 19.3% | 14.9% |
Obesity | 24.6% | 38.1% |
Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Granite bay vs Southfield
- In Southfield, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.4% compared to 14.1% in Granite bay.
- Depression is more prevalent in Granite bay at 18.9% compared to 17.6% in Southfield.
- Southfield has a higher smoking rate at 14.8% compared to 8.6% in Granite bay.
- Binge drinking is more common in Granite bay at 19.3% compared to 14.9% in Southfield.
- Southfield has higher obesity rates at 38.1% compared to 24.6% in Granite bay.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Southfield at 17.0% compared to 9.0% in Granite bay.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Granite bay | Southfield |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.2% (45) | 1.2% (870) |
High School Diploma | 6.4% (1,425) | 12.0% (9,038) |
Less than High School | 3.4% (753) | 6.1% (4,623) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 41.4% (9,173) | 27.5% (20,760) |
Education Levels Comparison: Granite bay vs Southfield
- In Southfield, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.2% in Granite bay.
- In Southfield, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 12.0% compared to 6.4% in Granite bay.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Southfield at 6.1%, compared to 3.4% in Granite bay.
- A higher percentage of residents in Granite bay hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 41.4% compared to 27.5% in Southfield.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.