Demographics details for Grandview, MO vs Woodburn, OR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Grandview, MO vs Woodburn, OR.
| Data | Grandview | Woodburn |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 25,610 | 27,290 |
| Median Age | 35.9 years | 39.2 years |
| Median Income | $51,048 | $58,916 |
| Married Families | 30.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.8 |
Population Comparison: Grandview vs Woodburn
- The population in Woodburn is higher at 27,290, compared to 25,610 in Grandview.
- The median age in Woodburn is higher at 39.2 years, compared to 35.9 years in Grandview.
- Woodburn has a higher median income of $58,916, compared to $51,048 in Grandview.
- In Woodburn, the percentage of married families is higher at 35.0%, compared to 30.0% in Grandview.
- The poverty level is higher in Woodburn at 12%, compared to 9% in Grandview.
- The unemployment rate in Grandview is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.8% in Woodburn.
Demographics
Demographics Grandview vs Woodburn provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Grandview | Woodburn |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 34 | Data is updating |
| White | 40 | 22 |
| Asian | 2 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 15 | 59 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 17 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Grandview vs Woodburn
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Grandview at 34% compared to 0% in Woodburn.
- Grandview has a higher percentage of White residents at 40% compared to 22% in Woodburn.
- The Asian population is larger in Grandview at 2% compared to 1% in Woodburn.
- Woodburn has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 59%, compared to 15% in Grandview.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Woodburn at 17%, compared to 8% in Grandview.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Grandview and Woodburn at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Grandview | Woodburn |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.4% | 18.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.1% | 14.7% |
| Depression | 21.6% | 27.1% |
| Smoking | 20.4% | 18.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.1% | 14.4% |
| Obesity | 41.9% | 40.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Grandview vs Woodburn
- More residents in Grandview report poor mental health at 19.4% compared to 18.9% in Woodburn.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Woodburn at 27.1% versus 21.6% in Grandview.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Grandview at 20.4% compared to 18.0% in Woodburn.
- Binge drinking is more common in Grandview at 18.1% compared to 14.4% in Woodburn.
- Obesity rates are higher in Grandview at 41.9% compared to 40.5% in Woodburn.
- Disability percentages are higher in Grandview at 15.0% compared to 14.0% in Woodburn.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Grandview | Woodburn |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.8% (200) | 3.6% (992) |
| High School Diploma | 19.0% (4,878) | 13.3% (3,628) |
| Less than High School | 10.6% (2,721) | 38.2% (10,414) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.2% (4,147) | 9.4% (2,578) |
Education Levels Comparison: Grandview vs Woodburn
- In Woodburn, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.6% compared to 0.8% in Grandview.
- A higher percentage of residents in Grandview hold a high school diploma at 19.0% compared to 13.3% in Woodburn.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Woodburn at 38.2%, compared to 10.6% in Grandview.
- A higher percentage of residents in Grandview hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.2% compared to 9.4% in Woodburn.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.