Demographics details for Grandview, MO vs Sterling heights, MI

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Grandview, MO vs Sterling heights, MI.

Data Grandview Sterling heights
Population 25,610 132,567
Median Age 35.9 years 41.2 years
Median Income $51,048 $75,381
Married Families 30.0% 45.0%
Poverty Level 9% 8%
Unemployment Rate 4.5 4.7

Population Comparison: Grandview vs Sterling heights

  • The population in Sterling heights is higher at 132,567, compared to 25,610 in Grandview.
  • The median age in Sterling heights is higher at 41.2 years, compared to 35.9 years in Grandview.
  • Sterling heights has a higher median income of $75,381, compared to $51,048 in Grandview.
  • In Sterling heights, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 30.0% in Grandview.
  • Grandview has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 8% in Sterling heights.
  • Sterling heights has a higher unemployment rate at 4.7% compared to 4.5% in Grandview.

Demographics

Demographics Grandview vs Sterling heights provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Grandview Sterling heights
Black 34 6
White 40 79
Asian 2 9
Hispanic 15 2
Two or More Races 8 4
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Grandview vs Sterling heights

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Grandview at 34% compared to 6% in Sterling heights.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Sterling heights at 79% compared to 40% in Grandview.
  • In Sterling heights, the Asian population stands at 9%, greater than 2% in Grandview.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Grandview at 15% compared to 2% in Sterling heights.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Grandview at 8% compared to 4% in Sterling heights.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Grandview at 1% compared to 0% in Sterling heights.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Grandview Sterling heights
Mental Health Not Good 19.4% 17.8%
Physical Health Not Good 13.1% 11.4%
Depression 21.6% 25.5%
Smoking 20.4% 19.8%
Binge Drinking 18.1% 17.7%
Obesity 41.9% 36.6%
Disability Percentage 15.0% 13.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Grandview vs Sterling heights

  • More residents in Grandview report poor mental health at 19.4% compared to 17.8% in Sterling heights.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Sterling heights at 25.5% versus 21.6% in Grandview.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Grandview at 20.4% compared to 19.8% in Sterling heights.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Grandview at 18.1% compared to 17.7% in Sterling heights.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Grandview at 41.9% compared to 36.6% in Sterling heights.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Grandview at 15.0% compared to 13.0% in Sterling heights.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Grandview Sterling heights
No Schooling 0.8% (200) 2.4% (3,134)
High School Diploma 19.0% (4,878) 18.8% (24,937)
Less than High School 10.6% (2,721) 16.6% (22,008)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 16.2% (4,147) 22.3% (29,518)

Education Levels Comparison: Grandview vs Sterling heights

  • In Sterling heights, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.4% compared to 0.8% in Grandview.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Grandview hold a high school diploma at 19.0% compared to 18.8% in Sterling heights.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Sterling heights at 16.6%, compared to 10.6% in Grandview.
  • In Sterling heights, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.3% compared to 16.2% in Grandview.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.