Demographics details for Grandview, MO vs Riverbank, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Grandview, MO vs Riverbank, CA.
| Data | Grandview | Riverbank |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 25,610 | 24,826 |
| Median Age | 35.9 years | 33.6 years |
| Median Income | $51,048 | $89,504 |
| Married Families | 30.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Grandview vs Riverbank
- In Grandview, the population is higher at 25,610, compared to 24,826 in Riverbank.
- Residents in Grandview have a higher median age of 35.9 years compared to 33.6 years in Riverbank.
- Riverbank has a higher median income of $89,504, compared to $51,048 in Grandview.
- In Riverbank, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 30.0% in Grandview.
- The poverty level is higher in Riverbank at 10%, compared to 9% in Grandview.
- Riverbank has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 4.5% in Grandview.
Demographics
Demographics Grandview vs Riverbank provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Grandview | Riverbank |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 34 | 1 |
| White | 40 | 13 |
| Asian | 2 | 6 |
| Hispanic | 15 | 55 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 23 |
| American Indian | 1 | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Grandview vs Riverbank
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Grandview at 34% compared to 1% in Riverbank.
- Grandview has a higher percentage of White residents at 40% compared to 13% in Riverbank.
- In Riverbank, the Asian population stands at 6%, greater than 2% in Grandview.
- Riverbank has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 55%, compared to 15% in Grandview.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Riverbank at 23%, compared to 8% in Grandview.
- In Riverbank, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 1% in Grandview.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Grandview | Riverbank |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.4% | 17.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.1% | 13.2% |
| Depression | 21.6% | 21.0% |
| Smoking | 20.4% | 15.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.1% | 16.4% |
| Obesity | 41.9% | 35.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Grandview vs Riverbank
- More residents in Grandview report poor mental health at 19.4% compared to 17.2% in Riverbank.
- Depression is more prevalent in Grandview at 21.6% compared to 21.0% in Riverbank.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Grandview at 20.4% compared to 15.0% in Riverbank.
- Binge drinking is more common in Grandview at 18.1% compared to 16.4% in Riverbank.
- Obesity rates are higher in Grandview at 41.9% compared to 35.0% in Riverbank.
- Disability percentages are higher in Grandview at 15.0% compared to 10.0% in Riverbank.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Grandview | Riverbank |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.8% (200) | 3.1% (766) |
| High School Diploma | 19.0% (4,878) | 15.2% (3,764) |
| Less than High School | 10.6% (2,721) | 22.2% (5,505) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.2% (4,147) | 11.3% (2,804) |
Education Levels Comparison: Grandview vs Riverbank
- In Riverbank, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.1% compared to 0.8% in Grandview.
- A higher percentage of residents in Grandview hold a high school diploma at 19.0% compared to 15.2% in Riverbank.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Riverbank at 22.2%, compared to 10.6% in Grandview.
- A higher percentage of residents in Grandview hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.2% compared to 11.3% in Riverbank.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.