Demographics details for Grandview, MO vs Cambridge, MD
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Grandview, MO vs Cambridge, MD.
Data | Grandview | Cambridge |
---|---|---|
Population | 25,610 | 13,129 |
Median Age | 35.9 years | 37.3 years |
Median Income | $51,048 | $44,114 |
Married Families | 30.0% | 27.0% |
Poverty Level | 9% | 11% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Grandview vs Cambridge
- In Grandview, the population is higher at 25,610, compared to 13,129 in Cambridge.
- The median age in Cambridge is higher at 37.3 years, compared to 35.9 years in Grandview.
- Grandview has a higher median income of $51,048 compared to $44,114 in Cambridge.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Grandview at 30.0% compared to 27.0% in Cambridge.
- The poverty level is higher in Cambridge at 11%, compared to 9% in Grandview.
- Cambridge has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 4.5% in Grandview.
Demographics
Demographics Grandview vs Cambridge provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Grandview | Cambridge |
---|---|---|
Black | 34 | 44 |
White | 40 | 35 |
Asian | 2 | 2 |
Hispanic | 15 | 8 |
Two or More Races | 8 | 11 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Grandview vs Cambridge
- In Cambridge, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 44% compared to 34% in Grandview.
- Grandview has a higher percentage of White residents at 40% compared to 35% in Cambridge.
- Both Grandview and Cambridge have the same percentage of Asian residents at 2%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Grandview at 15% compared to 8% in Cambridge.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Cambridge at 11%, compared to 8% in Grandview.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Grandview at 1% compared to 0% in Cambridge.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Grandview | Cambridge |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.4% | 18.2% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.1% | 13.2% |
Depression | 21.6% | 20.3% |
Smoking | 20.4% | 20.9% |
Binge Drinking | 18.1% | 12.6% |
Obesity | 41.9% | 42.2% |
Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Grandview vs Cambridge
- More residents in Grandview report poor mental health at 19.4% compared to 18.2% in Cambridge.
- Depression is more prevalent in Grandview at 21.6% compared to 20.3% in Cambridge.
- Cambridge has a higher smoking rate at 20.9% compared to 20.4% in Grandview.
- Binge drinking is more common in Grandview at 18.1% compared to 12.6% in Cambridge.
- Cambridge has higher obesity rates at 42.2% compared to 41.9% in Grandview.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Cambridge at 18.0% compared to 15.0% in Grandview.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Grandview | Cambridge |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.8% (200) | 0.9% (120) |
High School Diploma | 19.0% (4,878) | 22.1% (2,903) |
Less than High School | 10.6% (2,721) | 11.2% (1,477) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.2% (4,147) | 13.6% (1,783) |
Education Levels Comparison: Grandview vs Cambridge
- In Cambridge, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.8% in Grandview.
- In Cambridge, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.1% compared to 19.0% in Grandview.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Cambridge at 11.2%, compared to 10.6% in Grandview.
- A higher percentage of residents in Grandview hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.2% compared to 13.6% in Cambridge.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.