Demographics details for Grand saline, TX vs Union city, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Grand saline, TX vs Union city, CA.
Data | Grand saline | Union city |
---|---|---|
Population | 3,219 | 67,039 |
Median Age | 42.6 years | 41.3 years |
Median Income | $37,823 | $138,013 |
Married Families | 33.0% | 50.0% |
Poverty Level | 16% | 9% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.7 |
Population Comparison: Grand saline vs Union city
- The population in Union city is higher at 67,039, compared to 3,219 in Grand saline.
- Residents in Grand saline have a higher median age of 42.6 years compared to 41.3 years in Union city.
- Union city has a higher median income of $138,013, compared to $37,823 in Grand saline.
- In Union city, the percentage of married families is higher at 50.0%, compared to 33.0% in Grand saline.
- Grand saline has a higher poverty level at 16% compared to 9% in Union city.
- Union city has a higher unemployment rate at 4.7% compared to 3.5% in Grand saline.
Demographics
Demographics Grand saline vs Union city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Grand saline | Union city |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 5 |
White | 56 | 6 |
Asian | Data is updating | 58 |
Hispanic | 31 | 21 |
Two or More Races | 11 | 9 |
American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Grand saline vs Union city
- In Union city, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 1% in Grand saline.
- Grand saline has a higher percentage of White residents at 56% compared to 6% in Union city.
- In Union city, the Asian population stands at 58%, greater than 0% in Grand saline.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Grand saline at 31% compared to 21% in Union city.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Grand saline at 11% compared to 9% in Union city.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Grand saline and Union city at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Grand saline | Union city |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 22.1% | 12.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 16.9% | 8.0% |
Depression | 27.9% | 13.9% |
Smoking | 26.7% | 8.6% |
Binge Drinking | 16.7% | 13.7% |
Obesity | 40.2% | 21.7% |
Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Grand saline vs Union city
- More residents in Grand saline report poor mental health at 22.1% compared to 12.8% in Union city.
- Depression is more prevalent in Grand saline at 27.9% compared to 13.9% in Union city.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Grand saline at 26.7% compared to 8.6% in Union city.
- Binge drinking is more common in Grand saline at 16.7% compared to 13.7% in Union city.
- Obesity rates are higher in Grand saline at 40.2% compared to 21.7% in Union city.
- Disability percentages are higher in Grand saline at 17.0% compared to 9.0% in Union city.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Grand saline | Union city |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.9% (94) | 2.7% (1,812) |
High School Diploma | 17.6% (568) | 14.2% (9,499) |
Less than High School | 44.1% (1,421) | 15.3% (10,264) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 6.6% (213) | 34.7% (23,285) |
Education Levels Comparison: Grand saline vs Union city
- A higher percentage of residents in Grand saline have no formal schooling at 2.9% compared to 2.7% in Union city.
- A higher percentage of residents in Grand saline hold a high school diploma at 17.6% compared to 14.2% in Union city.
- More residents in Grand saline have less than a high school education at 44.1% compared to 15.3% in Union city.
- In Union city, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 34.7% compared to 6.6% in Grand saline.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.