Demographics details for Grand saline, TX vs Piggott, AR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Grand saline, TX vs Piggott, AR.
| Data | Grand saline | Piggott |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 3,219 | 3,545 |
| Median Age | 42.6 years | 37.6 years |
| Median Income | $37,823 | $43,255 |
| Married Families | 33.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 16% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Grand saline vs Piggott
- The population in Piggott is higher at 3,545, compared to 3,219 in Grand saline.
- Residents in Grand saline have a higher median age of 42.6 years compared to 37.6 years in Piggott.
- Piggott has a higher median income of $43,255, compared to $37,823 in Grand saline.
- In Piggott, the percentage of married families is higher at 35.0%, compared to 33.0% in Grand saline.
- Grand saline has a higher poverty level at 16% compared to 15% in Piggott.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Grand saline and Piggott at 3.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Grand saline vs Piggott provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Grand saline | Piggott |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | Data is updating |
| White | 56 | 96 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 31 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 2 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Grand saline vs Piggott
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Grand saline at 1% compared to 0% in Piggott.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Piggott at 96% compared to 56% in Grand saline.
- Both Grand saline and Piggott have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Grand saline at 31% compared to 1% in Piggott.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Grand saline at 11% compared to 2% in Piggott.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Grand saline and Piggott at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Grand saline | Piggott |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 22.1% | 20.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 16.9% | 14.7% |
| Depression | 27.9% | 29.5% |
| Smoking | 26.7% | 23.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.7% | 15.0% |
| Obesity | 40.2% | 39.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Grand saline vs Piggott
- More residents in Grand saline report poor mental health at 22.1% compared to 20.7% in Piggott.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Piggott at 29.5% versus 27.9% in Grand saline.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Grand saline at 26.7% compared to 23.9% in Piggott.
- Binge drinking is more common in Grand saline at 16.7% compared to 15.0% in Piggott.
- Obesity rates are higher in Grand saline at 40.2% compared to 39.2% in Piggott.
- Disability percentages are higher in Grand saline at 17.0% compared to 16.0% in Piggott.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Grand saline | Piggott |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.9% (94) | 0.4% (14) |
| High School Diploma | 17.6% (568) | 21.0% (746) |
| Less than High School | 44.1% (1,421) | 11.9% (423) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 6.6% (213) | 11.7% (414) |
Education Levels Comparison: Grand saline vs Piggott
- A higher percentage of residents in Grand saline have no formal schooling at 2.9% compared to 0.4% in Piggott.
- In Piggott, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.0% compared to 17.6% in Grand saline.
- More residents in Grand saline have less than a high school education at 44.1% compared to 11.9% in Piggott.
- In Piggott, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.7% compared to 6.6% in Grand saline.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.