Demographics details for Grand saline, TX vs Federal way, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Grand saline, TX vs Federal way, WA.
Data | Grand saline | Federal way |
---|---|---|
Population | 3,219 | 97,863 |
Median Age | 42.6 years | 37.4 years |
Median Income | $37,823 | $80,360 |
Married Families | 33.0% | 39.0% |
Poverty Level | 16% | 9% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 5.7 |
Population Comparison: Grand saline vs Federal way
- The population in Federal way is higher at 97,863, compared to 3,219 in Grand saline.
- Residents in Grand saline have a higher median age of 42.6 years compared to 37.4 years in Federal way.
- Federal way has a higher median income of $80,360, compared to $37,823 in Grand saline.
- In Federal way, the percentage of married families is higher at 39.0%, compared to 33.0% in Grand saline.
- Grand saline has a higher poverty level at 16% compared to 9% in Federal way.
- Federal way has a higher unemployment rate at 5.7% compared to 3.5% in Grand saline.
Demographics
Demographics Grand saline vs Federal way provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Grand saline | Federal way |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 17 |
White | 56 | 34 |
Asian | Data is updating | 15 |
Hispanic | 31 | 19 |
Two or More Races | 11 | 14 |
American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Grand saline vs Federal way
- In Federal way, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 17% compared to 1% in Grand saline.
- Grand saline has a higher percentage of White residents at 56% compared to 34% in Federal way.
- In Federal way, the Asian population stands at 15%, greater than 0% in Grand saline.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Grand saline at 31% compared to 19% in Federal way.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Federal way at 14%, compared to 11% in Grand saline.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Grand saline and Federal way at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Grand saline | Federal way |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 22.1% | 17.5% |
Physical Health Not Good | 16.9% | 10.9% |
Depression | 27.9% | 24.7% |
Smoking | 26.7% | 12.7% |
Binge Drinking | 16.7% | 16.5% |
Obesity | 40.2% | 27.2% |
Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Grand saline vs Federal way
- More residents in Grand saline report poor mental health at 22.1% compared to 17.5% in Federal way.
- Depression is more prevalent in Grand saline at 27.9% compared to 24.7% in Federal way.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Grand saline at 26.7% compared to 12.7% in Federal way.
- Binge drinking is more common in Grand saline at 16.7% compared to 16.5% in Federal way.
- Obesity rates are higher in Grand saline at 40.2% compared to 27.2% in Federal way.
- Disability percentages are higher in Grand saline at 17.0% compared to 12.0% in Federal way.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Grand saline | Federal way |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.9% (94) | 1.8% (1,735) |
High School Diploma | 17.6% (568) | 15.3% (15,003) |
Less than High School | 44.1% (1,421) | 11.0% (10,805) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 6.6% (213) | 21.2% (20,761) |
Education Levels Comparison: Grand saline vs Federal way
- A higher percentage of residents in Grand saline have no formal schooling at 2.9% compared to 1.8% in Federal way.
- A higher percentage of residents in Grand saline hold a high school diploma at 17.6% compared to 15.3% in Federal way.
- More residents in Grand saline have less than a high school education at 44.1% compared to 11.0% in Federal way.
- In Federal way, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.2% compared to 6.6% in Grand saline.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.