Demographics details for Grand saline, TX vs Canoga park, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Grand saline, TX vs Canoga park, CA.
Data | Grand saline | Canoga park |
---|---|---|
Population | 3,219 | 58,116 |
Median Age | 42.6 years | 39.0 years |
Median Income | $37,823 | $78,500 |
Married Families | 33.0% | 18900.0% |
Poverty Level | 16% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Grand saline vs Canoga park
- The population in Canoga park is higher at 58,116, compared to 3,219 in Grand saline.
- Residents in Grand saline have a higher median age of 42.6 years compared to 39.0 years in Canoga park.
- Canoga park has a higher median income of $78,500, compared to $37,823 in Grand saline.
- In Canoga park, the percentage of married families is higher at 18900.0%, compared to 33.0% in Grand saline.
- Grand saline has a higher poverty level at 16% compared to 12% in Canoga park.
- Canoga park has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.5% in Grand saline.
Demographics
Demographics Grand saline vs Canoga park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Grand saline | Canoga park |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 3 |
White | 56 | 52 |
Asian | Data is updating | 10 |
Hispanic | 31 | 30 |
Two or More Races | 11 | 5 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Grand saline vs Canoga park
- In Canoga park, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 1% in Grand saline.
- Grand saline has a higher percentage of White residents at 56% compared to 52% in Canoga park.
- In Canoga park, the Asian population stands at 10%, greater than 0% in Grand saline.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Grand saline at 31% compared to 30% in Canoga park.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Grand saline at 11% compared to 5% in Canoga park.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Grand saline at 1% compared to 0% in Canoga park.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Grand saline | Canoga park |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 22.1% | Data is updating% |
Physical Health Not Good | 16.9% | Data is updating% |
Depression | 27.9% | Data is updating% |
Smoking | 26.7% | Data is updating% |
Binge Drinking | 16.7% | Data is updating% |
Obesity | 40.2% | Data is updating% |
Disability Percentage | 17.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Grand saline vs Canoga park
- More residents in Grand saline report poor mental health at 22.1% compared to 0.0% in Canoga park.
- Depression is more prevalent in Grand saline at 27.9% compared to 0.0% in Canoga park.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Grand saline at 26.7% compared to 0.0% in Canoga park.
- Binge drinking is more common in Grand saline at 16.7% compared to 0.0% in Canoga park.
- Obesity rates are higher in Grand saline at 40.2% compared to 0.0% in Canoga park.
- Disability percentages are higher in Grand saline at 17.0% compared to 0.0% in Canoga park.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Grand saline | Canoga park |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.9% (94) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 17.6% (568) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Less than High School | 44.1% (1,421) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 6.6% (213) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Grand saline vs Canoga park
- A higher percentage of residents in Grand saline have no formal schooling at 2.9% compared to 0.0% in Canoga park.
- A higher percentage of residents in Grand saline hold a high school diploma at 17.6% compared to 0.0% in Canoga park.
- More residents in Grand saline have less than a high school education at 44.1% compared to 0.0% in Canoga park.
- A higher percentage of residents in Grand saline hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 6.6% compared to 0.0% in Canoga park.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.