Demographics details for Grand rapids, MI vs Vancouver, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Grand rapids, MI vs Vancouver, WA.
| Data | Grand rapids | Vancouver |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 196,908 | 194,512 |
| Median Age | 31.8 years | 37.4 years |
| Median Income | $61,634 | $73,626 |
| Married Families | 31.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 14% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.3 | 4.6 |
Population Comparison: Grand rapids vs Vancouver
- In Grand rapids, the population is higher at 196,908, compared to 194,512 in Vancouver.
- The median age in Vancouver is higher at 37.4 years, compared to 31.8 years in Grand rapids.
- Vancouver has a higher median income of $73,626, compared to $61,634 in Grand rapids.
- In Vancouver, the percentage of married families is higher at 36.0%, compared to 31.0% in Grand rapids.
- Grand rapids has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 10% in Vancouver.
- The unemployment rate in Grand rapids is higher at 5.3%, compared to 4.6% in Vancouver.
Demographics
Demographics Grand rapids vs Vancouver provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Grand rapids | Vancouver |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 18 | 3 |
| White | 51 | 65 |
| Asian | 3 | 5 |
| Hispanic | 16 | 15 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 11 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Grand rapids vs Vancouver
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Grand rapids at 18% compared to 3% in Vancouver.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Vancouver at 65% compared to 51% in Grand rapids.
- In Vancouver, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 3% in Grand rapids.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Grand rapids at 16% compared to 15% in Vancouver.
- Both Grand rapids and Vancouver have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 11%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Grand rapids and Vancouver at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Grand rapids | Vancouver |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.6% | 17.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.5% | 11.5% |
| Depression | 25.3% | 25.7% |
| Smoking | 17.3% | 14.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.7% | 17.7% |
| Obesity | 34.9% | 33.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Grand rapids vs Vancouver
- More residents in Grand rapids report poor mental health at 17.6% compared to 17.5% in Vancouver.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Vancouver at 25.7% versus 25.3% in Grand rapids.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Grand rapids at 17.3% compared to 14.5% in Vancouver.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Vancouver at 17.7% compared to 16.7% in Grand rapids.
- Obesity rates are higher in Grand rapids at 34.9% compared to 33.1% in Vancouver.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Vancouver at 14.0% compared to 12.0% in Grand rapids.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Grand rapids | Vancouver |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.2% (2,304) | 0.8% (1,478) |
| High School Diploma | 12.4% (24,420) | 13.9% (26,995) |
| Less than High School | 12.2% (23,971) | 10.7% (20,890) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 25.6% (50,441) | 21.2% (41,308) |
Education Levels Comparison: Grand rapids vs Vancouver
- A higher percentage of residents in Grand rapids have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.8% in Vancouver.
- In Vancouver, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 13.9% compared to 12.4% in Grand rapids.
- More residents in Grand rapids have less than a high school education at 12.2% compared to 10.7% in Vancouver.
- A higher percentage of residents in Grand rapids hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 25.6% compared to 21.2% in Vancouver.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.