Demographics details for Grand rapids, MI vs Powder springs, GA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Grand rapids, MI vs Powder springs, GA.

Data Grand rapids Powder springs
Population 196,908 17,337
Median Age 31.8 years 38.7 years
Median Income $61,634 $88,311
Married Families 31.0% 36.0%
Poverty Level 14% 12%
Unemployment Rate 5.3 3.5

Population Comparison: Grand rapids vs Powder springs

  • In Grand rapids, the population is higher at 196,908, compared to 17,337 in Powder springs.
  • The median age in Powder springs is higher at 38.7 years, compared to 31.8 years in Grand rapids.
  • Powder springs has a higher median income of $88,311, compared to $61,634 in Grand rapids.
  • In Powder springs, the percentage of married families is higher at 36.0%, compared to 31.0% in Grand rapids.
  • Grand rapids has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 12% in Powder springs.
  • The unemployment rate in Grand rapids is higher at 5.3%, compared to 3.5% in Powder springs.

Demographics

Demographics Grand rapids vs Powder springs provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Grand rapids Powder springs
Black 18 51
White 51 22
Asian 3 2
Hispanic 16 19
Two or More Races 11 5
American Indian 1 1

Demographics Comparison: Grand rapids vs Powder springs

  • In Powder springs, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 51% compared to 18% in Grand rapids.
  • Grand rapids has a higher percentage of White residents at 51% compared to 22% in Powder springs.
  • The Asian population is larger in Grand rapids at 3% compared to 2% in Powder springs.
  • Powder springs has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 19%, compared to 16% in Grand rapids.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Grand rapids at 11% compared to 5% in Powder springs.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Grand rapids and Powder springs at 1%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Grand rapids Powder springs
Mental Health Not Good 17.6% 15.0%
Physical Health Not Good 11.5% 10.7%
Depression 25.3% 17.7%
Smoking 17.3% 14.4%
Binge Drinking 16.7% 14.4%
Obesity 34.9% 33.0%
Disability Percentage 12.0% 11.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Grand rapids vs Powder springs

  • More residents in Grand rapids report poor mental health at 17.6% compared to 15.0% in Powder springs.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Grand rapids at 25.3% compared to 17.7% in Powder springs.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Grand rapids at 17.3% compared to 14.4% in Powder springs.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Grand rapids at 16.7% compared to 14.4% in Powder springs.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Grand rapids at 34.9% compared to 33.0% in Powder springs.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Grand rapids at 12.0% compared to 11.0% in Powder springs.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Grand rapids Powder springs
No Schooling 1.2% (2,304) 1.3% (225)
High School Diploma 12.4% (24,420) 15.0% (2,598)
Less than High School 12.2% (23,971) 7.6% (1,309)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 25.6% (50,441) 26.3% (4,561)

Education Levels Comparison: Grand rapids vs Powder springs

  • In Powder springs, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 1.2% in Grand rapids.
  • In Powder springs, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.0% compared to 12.4% in Grand rapids.
  • More residents in Grand rapids have less than a high school education at 12.2% compared to 7.6% in Powder springs.
  • In Powder springs, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.3% compared to 25.6% in Grand rapids.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.