Demographics details for Grand rapids, MI vs Mountain home, AR

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Grand rapids, MI vs Mountain home, AR.

Data Grand rapids Mountain home
Population 196,908 13,150
Median Age 31.8 years 41.8 years
Median Income $61,634 $42,281
Married Families 31.0% 38.0%
Poverty Level 14% 14%
Unemployment Rate 5.3 3.5

Population Comparison: Grand rapids vs Mountain home

  • In Grand rapids, the population is higher at 196,908, compared to 13,150 in Mountain home.
  • The median age in Mountain home is higher at 41.8 years, compared to 31.8 years in Grand rapids.
  • Grand rapids has a higher median income of $61,634 compared to $42,281 in Mountain home.
  • In Mountain home, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 31.0% in Grand rapids.
  • The poverty level is identical in both Grand rapids and Mountain home at 14%.
  • The unemployment rate in Grand rapids is higher at 5.3%, compared to 3.5% in Mountain home.

Demographics

Demographics Grand rapids vs Mountain home provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Grand rapids Mountain home
Black 18 Data is updating
White 51 90
Asian 3 1
Hispanic 16 4
Two or More Races 11 4
American Indian 1 1

Demographics Comparison: Grand rapids vs Mountain home

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Grand rapids at 18% compared to 0% in Mountain home.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Mountain home at 90% compared to 51% in Grand rapids.
  • The Asian population is larger in Grand rapids at 3% compared to 1% in Mountain home.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Grand rapids at 16% compared to 4% in Mountain home.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Grand rapids at 11% compared to 4% in Mountain home.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Grand rapids and Mountain home at 1%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Grand rapids Mountain home
Mental Health Not Good 17.6% 19.2%
Physical Health Not Good 11.5% 12.9%
Depression 25.3% 28.5%
Smoking 17.3% 21.1%
Binge Drinking 16.7% 16.3%
Obesity 34.9% 34.3%
Disability Percentage 12.0% 22.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Grand rapids vs Mountain home

  • In Mountain home, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 17.6% in Grand rapids.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Mountain home at 28.5% versus 25.3% in Grand rapids.
  • Mountain home has a higher smoking rate at 21.1% compared to 17.3% in Grand rapids.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Grand rapids at 16.7% compared to 16.3% in Mountain home.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Grand rapids at 34.9% compared to 34.3% in Mountain home.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Mountain home at 22.0% compared to 12.0% in Grand rapids.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Grand rapids Mountain home
No Schooling 1.2% (2,304) 0.7% (87)
High School Diploma 12.4% (24,420) 16.9% (2,225)
Less than High School 12.2% (23,971) 14.2% (1,870)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 25.6% (50,441) 15.0% (1,973)

Education Levels Comparison: Grand rapids vs Mountain home

  • A higher percentage of residents in Grand rapids have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.7% in Mountain home.
  • In Mountain home, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.9% compared to 12.4% in Grand rapids.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Mountain home at 14.2%, compared to 12.2% in Grand rapids.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Grand rapids hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 25.6% compared to 15.0% in Mountain home.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.