Demographics details for Grand rapids, MI vs Moreno valley, CA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Grand rapids, MI vs Moreno valley, CA.

Data Grand rapids Moreno valley
Population 196,908 211,924
Median Age 31.8 years 31.8 years
Median Income $61,634 $82,637
Married Families 31.0% 34.0%
Poverty Level 14% 16%
Unemployment Rate 5.3 5.6

Population Comparison: Grand rapids vs Moreno valley

  • The population in Moreno valley is higher at 211,924, compared to 196,908 in Grand rapids.
  • The median age is the same in both Grand rapids and Moreno valley at 31.8 years.
  • Moreno valley has a higher median income of $82,637, compared to $61,634 in Grand rapids.
  • In Moreno valley, the percentage of married families is higher at 34.0%, compared to 31.0% in Grand rapids.
  • The poverty level is higher in Moreno valley at 16%, compared to 14% in Grand rapids.
  • Moreno valley has a higher unemployment rate at 5.6% compared to 5.3% in Grand rapids.

Demographics

Demographics Grand rapids vs Moreno valley provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Grand rapids Moreno valley
Black 18 17
White 51 6
Asian 3 5
Hispanic 16 60
Two or More Races 11 11
American Indian 1 1

Demographics Comparison: Grand rapids vs Moreno valley

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Grand rapids at 18% compared to 17% in Moreno valley.
  • Grand rapids has a higher percentage of White residents at 51% compared to 6% in Moreno valley.
  • In Moreno valley, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 3% in Grand rapids.
  • Moreno valley has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 60%, compared to 16% in Grand rapids.
  • Both Grand rapids and Moreno valley have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 11%.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Grand rapids and Moreno valley at 1%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Grand rapids Moreno valley
Mental Health Not Good 17.6% 16.4%
Physical Health Not Good 11.5% 12.5%
Depression 25.3% 16.6%
Smoking 17.3% 14.0%
Binge Drinking 16.7% 15.3%
Obesity 34.9% 38.2%
Disability Percentage 12.0% 10.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Grand rapids vs Moreno valley

  • More residents in Grand rapids report poor mental health at 17.6% compared to 16.4% in Moreno valley.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Grand rapids at 25.3% compared to 16.6% in Moreno valley.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Grand rapids at 17.3% compared to 14.0% in Moreno valley.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Grand rapids at 16.7% compared to 15.3% in Moreno valley.
  • Moreno valley has higher obesity rates at 38.2% compared to 34.9% in Grand rapids.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Grand rapids at 12.0% compared to 10.0% in Moreno valley.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Grand rapids Moreno valley
No Schooling 1.2% (2,304) 2.1% (4,503)
High School Diploma 12.4% (24,420) 16.2% (34,348)
Less than High School 12.2% (23,971) 23.9% (50,595)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 25.6% (50,441) 10.4% (22,123)

Education Levels Comparison: Grand rapids vs Moreno valley

  • In Moreno valley, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 1.2% in Grand rapids.
  • In Moreno valley, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.2% compared to 12.4% in Grand rapids.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Moreno valley at 23.9%, compared to 12.2% in Grand rapids.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Grand rapids hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 25.6% compared to 10.4% in Moreno valley.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.