Demographics details for Grand rapids, MI vs Leesburg, FL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Grand rapids, MI vs Leesburg, FL.
| Data | Grand rapids | Leesburg |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 196,908 | 29,178 |
| Median Age | 31.8 years | 43.6 years |
| Median Income | $61,634 | $43,733 |
| Married Families | 31.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 14% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.3 | 4.4 |
Population Comparison: Grand rapids vs Leesburg
- In Grand rapids, the population is higher at 196,908, compared to 29,178 in Leesburg.
- The median age in Leesburg is higher at 43.6 years, compared to 31.8 years in Grand rapids.
- Grand rapids has a higher median income of $61,634 compared to $43,733 in Leesburg.
- In Leesburg, the percentage of married families is higher at 35.0%, compared to 31.0% in Grand rapids.
- Grand rapids has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 11% in Leesburg.
- The unemployment rate in Grand rapids is higher at 5.3%, compared to 4.4% in Leesburg.
Demographics
Demographics Grand rapids vs Leesburg provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Grand rapids | Leesburg |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 18 | 19 |
| White | 51 | 46 |
| Asian | 3 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 16 | 24 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 10 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Grand rapids vs Leesburg
- In Leesburg, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 19% compared to 18% in Grand rapids.
- Grand rapids has a higher percentage of White residents at 51% compared to 46% in Leesburg.
- The Asian population is larger in Grand rapids at 3% compared to 1% in Leesburg.
- Leesburg has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 24%, compared to 16% in Grand rapids.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Grand rapids at 11% compared to 10% in Leesburg.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Grand rapids at 1% compared to 0% in Leesburg.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Grand rapids | Leesburg |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.6% | 18.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.5% | 13.0% |
| Depression | 25.3% | 21.1% |
| Smoking | 17.3% | 23.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.7% | 14.3% |
| Obesity | 34.9% | 39.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Grand rapids vs Leesburg
- In Leesburg, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.0% compared to 17.6% in Grand rapids.
- Depression is more prevalent in Grand rapids at 25.3% compared to 21.1% in Leesburg.
- Leesburg has a higher smoking rate at 23.6% compared to 17.3% in Grand rapids.
- Binge drinking is more common in Grand rapids at 16.7% compared to 14.3% in Leesburg.
- Leesburg has higher obesity rates at 39.8% compared to 34.9% in Grand rapids.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Leesburg at 19.0% compared to 12.0% in Grand rapids.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Grand rapids | Leesburg |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.2% (2,304) | 0.7% (209) |
| High School Diploma | 12.4% (24,420) | 21.5% (6,277) |
| Less than High School | 12.2% (23,971) | 11.4% (3,340) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 25.6% (50,441) | 11.7% (3,428) |
Education Levels Comparison: Grand rapids vs Leesburg
- A higher percentage of residents in Grand rapids have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.7% in Leesburg.
- In Leesburg, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.5% compared to 12.4% in Grand rapids.
- More residents in Grand rapids have less than a high school education at 12.2% compared to 11.4% in Leesburg.
- A higher percentage of residents in Grand rapids hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 25.6% compared to 11.7% in Leesburg.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.