Demographics details for Grand rapids, MI vs Chickasha, OK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Grand rapids, MI vs Chickasha, OK.
Data | Grand rapids | Chickasha |
---|---|---|
Population | 196,908 | 16,549 |
Median Age | 31.8 years | 36.4 years |
Median Income | $61,634 | $55,136 |
Married Families | 31.0% | 34.0% |
Poverty Level | 14% | 17% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.3 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Grand rapids vs Chickasha
- In Grand rapids, the population is higher at 196,908, compared to 16,549 in Chickasha.
- The median age in Chickasha is higher at 36.4 years, compared to 31.8 years in Grand rapids.
- Grand rapids has a higher median income of $61,634 compared to $55,136 in Chickasha.
- In Chickasha, the percentage of married families is higher at 34.0%, compared to 31.0% in Grand rapids.
- The poverty level is higher in Chickasha at 17%, compared to 14% in Grand rapids.
- The unemployment rate in Grand rapids is higher at 5.3%, compared to 3.2% in Chickasha.
Demographics
Demographics Grand rapids vs Chickasha provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Grand rapids | Chickasha |
---|---|---|
Black | 18 | 6 |
White | 51 | 71 |
Asian | 3 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 16 | 8 |
Two or More Races | 11 | 11 |
American Indian | 1 | 4 |
Demographics Comparison: Grand rapids vs Chickasha
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Grand rapids at 18% compared to 6% in Chickasha.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Chickasha at 71% compared to 51% in Grand rapids.
- The Asian population is larger in Grand rapids at 3% compared to 0% in Chickasha.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Grand rapids at 16% compared to 8% in Chickasha.
- Both Grand rapids and Chickasha have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 11%.
- In Chickasha, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 4%, compared to 1% in Grand rapids.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Grand rapids | Chickasha |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.6% | 19.1% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.5% | 13.7% |
Depression | 25.3% | 25.4% |
Smoking | 17.3% | 21.8% |
Binge Drinking | 16.7% | 13.8% |
Obesity | 34.9% | 40.8% |
Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Grand rapids vs Chickasha
- In Chickasha, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 17.6% in Grand rapids.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Chickasha at 25.4% versus 25.3% in Grand rapids.
- Chickasha has a higher smoking rate at 21.8% compared to 17.3% in Grand rapids.
- Binge drinking is more common in Grand rapids at 16.7% compared to 13.8% in Chickasha.
- Chickasha has higher obesity rates at 40.8% compared to 34.9% in Grand rapids.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Chickasha at 18.0% compared to 12.0% in Grand rapids.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Grand rapids | Chickasha |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.2% (2,304) | 0.5% (78) |
High School Diploma | 12.4% (24,420) | 22.5% (3,730) |
Less than High School | 12.2% (23,971) | 13.1% (2,160) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 25.6% (50,441) | 12.5% (2,066) |
Education Levels Comparison: Grand rapids vs Chickasha
- A higher percentage of residents in Grand rapids have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.5% in Chickasha.
- In Chickasha, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.5% compared to 12.4% in Grand rapids.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Chickasha at 13.1%, compared to 12.2% in Grand rapids.
- A higher percentage of residents in Grand rapids hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 25.6% compared to 12.5% in Chickasha.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.