Demographics details for Grand rapids, MI vs Auburn, AL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Grand rapids, MI vs Auburn, AL.
| Data | Grand rapids | Auburn |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 196,908 | 80,006 |
| Median Age | 31.8 years | 25.9 years |
| Median Income | $61,634 | $55,509 |
| Married Families | 31.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | 14% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.3 | 3.0 |
Population Comparison: Grand rapids vs Auburn
- In Grand rapids, the population is higher at 196,908, compared to 80,006 in Auburn.
- Residents in Grand rapids have a higher median age of 31.8 years compared to 25.9 years in Auburn.
- Grand rapids has a higher median income of $61,634 compared to $55,509 in Auburn.
- In Auburn, the percentage of married families is higher at 32.0%, compared to 31.0% in Grand rapids.
- Grand rapids has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 10% in Auburn.
- The unemployment rate in Grand rapids is higher at 5.3%, compared to 3.0% in Auburn.
Demographics
Demographics Grand rapids vs Auburn provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Grand rapids | Auburn |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 18 | 17 |
| White | 51 | 69 |
| Asian | 3 | 8 |
| Hispanic | 16 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 3 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Grand rapids vs Auburn
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Grand rapids at 18% compared to 17% in Auburn.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Auburn at 69% compared to 51% in Grand rapids.
- In Auburn, the Asian population stands at 8%, greater than 3% in Grand rapids.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Grand rapids at 16% compared to 3% in Auburn.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Grand rapids at 11% compared to 3% in Auburn.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Grand rapids at 1% compared to 0% in Auburn.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Grand rapids | Auburn |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.6% | 17.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.5% | 12.0% |
| Depression | 25.3% | 22.0% |
| Smoking | 17.3% | 15.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.7% | 14.5% |
| Obesity | 34.9% | 38.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Grand rapids vs Auburn
- Poor mental health levels are equal in both Grand rapids and Auburn at 17.6%.
- Depression is more prevalent in Grand rapids at 25.3% compared to 22.0% in Auburn.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Grand rapids at 17.3% compared to 15.5% in Auburn.
- Binge drinking is more common in Grand rapids at 16.7% compared to 14.5% in Auburn.
- Auburn has higher obesity rates at 38.7% compared to 34.9% in Grand rapids.
- Disability percentages are higher in Grand rapids at 12.0% compared to 8.0% in Auburn.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Grand rapids | Auburn |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.2% (2,304) | 0.3% (236) |
| High School Diploma | 12.4% (24,420) | 5.3% (4,206) |
| Less than High School | 12.2% (23,971) | 2.5% (1,964) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 25.6% (50,441) | 30.7% (24,546) |
Education Levels Comparison: Grand rapids vs Auburn
- A higher percentage of residents in Grand rapids have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.3% in Auburn.
- A higher percentage of residents in Grand rapids hold a high school diploma at 12.4% compared to 5.3% in Auburn.
- More residents in Grand rapids have less than a high school education at 12.2% compared to 2.5% in Auburn.
- In Auburn, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.7% compared to 25.6% in Grand rapids.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.