Demographics details for Grand prairie, TX vs Pulaski, WI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Grand prairie, TX vs Pulaski, WI.
Data | Grand prairie | Pulaski |
---|---|---|
Population | 201,843 | 4,045 |
Median Age | 33.7 years | 29.1 years |
Median Income | $76,626 | $65,906 |
Married Families | 38.0% | 28.0% |
Poverty Level | 14% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Grand prairie vs Pulaski
- In Grand prairie, the population is higher at 201,843, compared to 4,045 in Pulaski.
- Residents in Grand prairie have a higher median age of 33.7 years compared to 29.1 years in Pulaski.
- Grand prairie has a higher median income of $76,626 compared to $65,906 in Pulaski.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Grand prairie at 38.0% compared to 28.0% in Pulaski.
- Grand prairie has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 10% in Pulaski.
- The unemployment rate in Grand prairie is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.5% in Pulaski.
Demographics
Demographics Grand prairie vs Pulaski provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Grand prairie | Pulaski |
---|---|---|
Black | 23 | 1 |
White | 9 | 84 |
Asian | 7 | 2 |
Hispanic | 46 | 2 |
Two or More Races | 14 | 10 |
American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Grand prairie vs Pulaski
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Grand prairie at 23% compared to 1% in Pulaski.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Pulaski at 84% compared to 9% in Grand prairie.
- The Asian population is larger in Grand prairie at 7% compared to 2% in Pulaski.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Grand prairie at 46% compared to 2% in Pulaski.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Grand prairie at 14% compared to 10% in Pulaski.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Grand prairie and Pulaski at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Grand prairie | Pulaski |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.5% | 14.5% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.0% | 9.4% |
Depression | 21.4% | 22.4% |
Smoking | 16.1% | 14.6% |
Binge Drinking | 17.3% | 24.7% |
Obesity | 34.9% | 35.4% |
Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Grand prairie vs Pulaski
- More residents in Grand prairie report poor mental health at 16.5% compared to 14.5% in Pulaski.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Pulaski at 22.4% versus 21.4% in Grand prairie.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Grand prairie at 16.1% compared to 14.6% in Pulaski.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Pulaski at 24.7% compared to 17.3% in Grand prairie.
- Pulaski has higher obesity rates at 35.4% compared to 34.9% in Grand prairie.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Pulaski at 14.0% compared to 9.0% in Grand prairie.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Grand prairie | Pulaski |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.2% (4,493) | 0.4% (16) |
High School Diploma | 12.9% (26,069) | 17.7% (715) |
Less than High School | 21.3% (43,014) | 4.7% (191) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.4% (33,151) | 10.7% (432) |
Education Levels Comparison: Grand prairie vs Pulaski
- A higher percentage of residents in Grand prairie have no formal schooling at 2.2% compared to 0.4% in Pulaski.
- In Pulaski, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.7% compared to 12.9% in Grand prairie.
- More residents in Grand prairie have less than a high school education at 21.3% compared to 4.7% in Pulaski.
- A higher percentage of residents in Grand prairie hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.4% compared to 10.7% in Pulaski.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.