Demographics details for Grand prairie, TX vs Moorpark, CA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Grand prairie, TX vs Moorpark, CA.

Data Grand prairie Moorpark
Population 201,843 35,514
Median Age 33.7 years 38.8 years
Median Income $76,626 $143,218
Married Families 38.0% 47.0%
Poverty Level 14% 8%
Unemployment Rate 4.5 4.1

Population Comparison: Grand prairie vs Moorpark

  • In Grand prairie, the population is higher at 201,843, compared to 35,514 in Moorpark.
  • The median age in Moorpark is higher at 38.8 years, compared to 33.7 years in Grand prairie.
  • Moorpark has a higher median income of $143,218, compared to $76,626 in Grand prairie.
  • In Moorpark, the percentage of married families is higher at 47.0%, compared to 38.0% in Grand prairie.
  • Grand prairie has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 8% in Moorpark.
  • The unemployment rate in Grand prairie is higher at 4.5%, compared to 4.1% in Moorpark.

Demographics

Demographics Grand prairie vs Moorpark provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Grand prairie Moorpark
Black 23 3
White 9 38
Asian 7 7
Hispanic 46 34
Two or More Races 14 17
American Indian 1 1

Demographics Comparison: Grand prairie vs Moorpark

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Grand prairie at 23% compared to 3% in Moorpark.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Moorpark at 38% compared to 9% in Grand prairie.
  • Both Grand prairie and Moorpark have the same percentage of Asian residents at 7%.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Grand prairie at 46% compared to 34% in Moorpark.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Moorpark at 17%, compared to 14% in Grand prairie.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Grand prairie and Moorpark at 1%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Grand prairie Moorpark
Mental Health Not Good 16.5% 13.8%
Physical Health Not Good 12.0% 8.9%
Depression 21.4% 17.6%
Smoking 16.1% 9.2%
Binge Drinking 17.3% 17.8%
Obesity 34.9% 24.7%
Disability Percentage 9.0% 10.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Grand prairie vs Moorpark

  • More residents in Grand prairie report poor mental health at 16.5% compared to 13.8% in Moorpark.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Grand prairie at 21.4% compared to 17.6% in Moorpark.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Grand prairie at 16.1% compared to 9.2% in Moorpark.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Moorpark at 17.8% compared to 17.3% in Grand prairie.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Grand prairie at 34.9% compared to 24.7% in Moorpark.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Moorpark at 10.0% compared to 9.0% in Grand prairie.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Grand prairie Moorpark
No Schooling 2.2% (4,493) 0.8% (300)
High School Diploma 12.9% (26,069) 9.3% (3,304)
Less than High School 21.3% (43,014) 11.8% (4,201)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 16.4% (33,151) 30.1% (10,699)

Education Levels Comparison: Grand prairie vs Moorpark

  • A higher percentage of residents in Grand prairie have no formal schooling at 2.2% compared to 0.8% in Moorpark.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Grand prairie hold a high school diploma at 12.9% compared to 9.3% in Moorpark.
  • More residents in Grand prairie have less than a high school education at 21.3% compared to 11.8% in Moorpark.
  • In Moorpark, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.1% compared to 16.4% in Grand prairie.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.