Demographics details for Grand junction, CO vs Winslow, AR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Grand junction, CO vs Winslow, AR.
Data | Grand junction | Winslow |
---|---|---|
Population | 68,034 | 362 |
Median Age | 39.9 years | 40.8 years |
Median Income | $62,993 | $43,036 |
Married Families | 35.0% | 32.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 15% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.7 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Grand junction vs Winslow
- In Grand junction, the population is higher at 68,034, compared to 362 in Winslow.
- The median age in Winslow is higher at 40.8 years, compared to 39.9 years in Grand junction.
- Grand junction has a higher median income of $62,993 compared to $43,036 in Winslow.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Grand junction at 35.0% compared to 32.0% in Winslow.
- The poverty level is higher in Winslow at 15%, compared to 10% in Grand junction.
- The unemployment rate in Grand junction is higher at 4.7%, compared to 3.5% in Winslow.
Demographics
Demographics Grand junction vs Winslow provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Grand junction | Winslow |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | Data is updating |
White | 73 | 87 |
Asian | 1 | 6 |
Hispanic | 16 | 1 |
Two or More Races | 8 | 4 |
American Indian | 1 | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Grand junction vs Winslow
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Grand junction at 1% compared to 0% in Winslow.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Winslow at 87% compared to 73% in Grand junction.
- In Winslow, the Asian population stands at 6%, greater than 1% in Grand junction.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Grand junction at 16% compared to 1% in Winslow.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Grand junction at 8% compared to 4% in Winslow.
- In Winslow, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 1% in Grand junction.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Grand junction | Winslow |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.8% | 18.6% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.8% | 12.5% |
Depression | 24.5% | 26.2% |
Smoking | 17.3% | 19.8% |
Binge Drinking | 19.2% | 16.5% |
Obesity | 29.2% | 32.3% |
Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 22.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Grand junction vs Winslow
- In Winslow, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.6% compared to 17.8% in Grand junction.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Winslow at 26.2% versus 24.5% in Grand junction.
- Winslow has a higher smoking rate at 19.8% compared to 17.3% in Grand junction.
- Binge drinking is more common in Grand junction at 19.2% compared to 16.5% in Winslow.
- Winslow has higher obesity rates at 32.3% compared to 29.2% in Grand junction.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Winslow at 22.0% compared to 15.0% in Grand junction.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Grand junction | Winslow |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.4% (245) | 0.3% (1) |
High School Diploma | 13.9% (9,476) | 23.2% (84) |
Less than High School | 9.7% (6,605) | 18.2% (66) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 23.8% (16,201) | 9.9% (36) |
Education Levels Comparison: Grand junction vs Winslow
- A higher percentage of residents in Grand junction have no formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.3% in Winslow.
- In Winslow, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 23.2% compared to 13.9% in Grand junction.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Winslow at 18.2%, compared to 9.7% in Grand junction.
- A higher percentage of residents in Grand junction hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.8% compared to 9.9% in Winslow.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.