Demographics details for Grand junction, CO vs Trenton, MI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Grand junction, CO vs Trenton, MI.
Data | Grand junction | Trenton |
---|---|---|
Population | 68,034 | 18,202 |
Median Age | 39.9 years | 49.1 years |
Median Income | $62,993 | $74,267 |
Married Families | 35.0% | 43.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 9% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.7 | 4.1 |
Population Comparison: Grand junction vs Trenton
- In Grand junction, the population is higher at 68,034, compared to 18,202 in Trenton.
- The median age in Trenton is higher at 49.1 years, compared to 39.9 years in Grand junction.
- Trenton has a higher median income of $74,267, compared to $62,993 in Grand junction.
- In Trenton, the percentage of married families is higher at 43.0%, compared to 35.0% in Grand junction.
- Grand junction has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 9% in Trenton.
- The unemployment rate in Grand junction is higher at 4.7%, compared to 4.1% in Trenton.
Demographics
Demographics Grand junction vs Trenton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Grand junction | Trenton |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 2 |
White | 73 | 87 |
Asian | 1 | 1 |
Hispanic | 16 | 5 |
Two or More Races | 8 | 5 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Grand junction vs Trenton
- In Trenton, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 1% in Grand junction.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Trenton at 87% compared to 73% in Grand junction.
- Both Grand junction and Trenton have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Grand junction at 16% compared to 5% in Trenton.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Grand junction at 8% compared to 5% in Trenton.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Grand junction at 1% compared to 0% in Trenton.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Grand junction | Trenton |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.8% | 16.2% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.8% | 10.0% |
Depression | 24.5% | 24.2% |
Smoking | 17.3% | 17.9% |
Binge Drinking | 19.2% | 20.3% |
Obesity | 29.2% | 30.1% |
Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Grand junction vs Trenton
- More residents in Grand junction report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 16.2% in Trenton.
- Depression is more prevalent in Grand junction at 24.5% compared to 24.2% in Trenton.
- Trenton has a higher smoking rate at 17.9% compared to 17.3% in Grand junction.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Trenton at 20.3% compared to 19.2% in Grand junction.
- Trenton has higher obesity rates at 30.1% compared to 29.2% in Grand junction.
- Disability percentages are higher in Grand junction at 15.0% compared to 13.0% in Trenton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Grand junction | Trenton |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.4% (245) | 0.3% (56) |
High School Diploma | 13.9% (9,476) | 20.8% (3,792) |
Less than High School | 9.7% (6,605) | 6.5% (1,189) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 23.8% (16,201) | 20.7% (3,764) |
Education Levels Comparison: Grand junction vs Trenton
- A higher percentage of residents in Grand junction have no formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.3% in Trenton.
- In Trenton, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 20.8% compared to 13.9% in Grand junction.
- More residents in Grand junction have less than a high school education at 9.7% compared to 6.5% in Trenton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Grand junction hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.8% compared to 20.7% in Trenton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.