Demographics details for Grand junction, CO vs Talbott, TN

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Grand junction, CO vs Talbott, TN.

Data Grand junction Talbott
Population 68,034 1,443
Median Age 39.9 years 38.0 years
Median Income $62,993 $55,000
Married Families 35.0% 51.0%
Poverty Level 10% 10%
Unemployment Rate 4.7 4.0

Population Comparison: Grand junction vs Talbott

  • In Grand junction, the population is higher at 68,034, compared to 1,443 in Talbott.
  • Residents in Grand junction have a higher median age of 39.9 years compared to 38.0 years in Talbott.
  • Grand junction has a higher median income of $62,993 compared to $55,000 in Talbott.
  • In Talbott, the percentage of married families is higher at 51.0%, compared to 35.0% in Grand junction.
  • The poverty level is identical in both Grand junction and Talbott at 10%.
  • The unemployment rate in Grand junction is higher at 4.7%, compared to 4.0% in Talbott.

Demographics

Demographics Grand junction vs Talbott provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Grand junction Talbott
Black 1 2
White 73 96
Asian 1 Data is updating
Hispanic 16 2
Two or More Races 8 Data is updating
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Grand junction vs Talbott

  • In Talbott, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 1% in Grand junction.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Talbott at 96% compared to 73% in Grand junction.
  • The Asian population is larger in Grand junction at 1% compared to 0% in Talbott.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Grand junction at 16% compared to 2% in Talbott.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Grand junction at 8% compared to 0% in Talbott.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Grand junction at 1% compared to 0% in Talbott.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Grand junction Talbott
Mental Health Not Good 17.8% Data is updating%
Physical Health Not Good 11.8% Data is updating%
Depression 24.5% Data is updating%
Smoking 17.3% Data is updating%
Binge Drinking 19.2% Data is updating%
Obesity 29.2% Data is updating%
Disability Percentage 15.0% Data is updating%

Health Statistics Comparison: Grand junction vs Talbott

  • More residents in Grand junction report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 0.0% in Talbott.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Grand junction at 24.5% compared to 0.0% in Talbott.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Grand junction at 17.3% compared to 0.0% in Talbott.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Grand junction at 19.2% compared to 0.0% in Talbott.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Grand junction at 29.2% compared to 0.0% in Talbott.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Grand junction at 15.0% compared to 0.0% in Talbott.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Grand junction Talbott
No Schooling 0.4% (245) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 13.9% (9,476) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Less than High School 9.7% (6,605) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 23.8% (16,201) 0.0% (Data is updating)

Education Levels Comparison: Grand junction vs Talbott

  • A higher percentage of residents in Grand junction have no formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.0% in Talbott.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Grand junction hold a high school diploma at 13.9% compared to 0.0% in Talbott.
  • More residents in Grand junction have less than a high school education at 9.7% compared to 0.0% in Talbott.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Grand junction hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.8% compared to 0.0% in Talbott.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.