Demographics details for Grand junction, CO vs Spartanburg, SC

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Grand junction, CO vs Spartanburg, SC.

Data Grand junction Spartanburg
Population 68,034 38,584
Median Age 39.9 years 35.5 years
Median Income $62,993 $49,140
Married Families 35.0% 28.0%
Poverty Level 10% 15%
Unemployment Rate 4.7 5.7

Population Comparison: Grand junction vs Spartanburg

  • In Grand junction, the population is higher at 68,034, compared to 38,584 in Spartanburg.
  • Residents in Grand junction have a higher median age of 39.9 years compared to 35.5 years in Spartanburg.
  • Grand junction has a higher median income of $62,993 compared to $49,140 in Spartanburg.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Grand junction at 35.0% compared to 28.0% in Spartanburg.
  • The poverty level is higher in Spartanburg at 15%, compared to 10% in Grand junction.
  • Spartanburg has a higher unemployment rate at 5.7% compared to 4.7% in Grand junction.

Demographics

Demographics Grand junction vs Spartanburg provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Grand junction Spartanburg
Black 1 45
White 73 44
Asian 1 2
Hispanic 16 5
Two or More Races 8 4
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Grand junction vs Spartanburg

  • In Spartanburg, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 45% compared to 1% in Grand junction.
  • Grand junction has a higher percentage of White residents at 73% compared to 44% in Spartanburg.
  • In Spartanburg, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in Grand junction.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Grand junction at 16% compared to 5% in Spartanburg.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Grand junction at 8% compared to 4% in Spartanburg.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Grand junction at 1% compared to 0% in Spartanburg.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Grand junction Spartanburg
Mental Health Not Good 17.8% 18.9%
Physical Health Not Good 11.8% 13.2%
Depression 24.5% 22.9%
Smoking 17.3% 20.1%
Binge Drinking 19.2% 13.8%
Obesity 29.2% 38.5%
Disability Percentage 15.0% 15.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Grand junction vs Spartanburg

  • In Spartanburg, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.9% compared to 17.8% in Grand junction.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Grand junction at 24.5% compared to 22.9% in Spartanburg.
  • Spartanburg has a higher smoking rate at 20.1% compared to 17.3% in Grand junction.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Grand junction at 19.2% compared to 13.8% in Spartanburg.
  • Spartanburg has higher obesity rates at 38.5% compared to 29.2% in Grand junction.
  • Disability percentages are the same in both Grand junction and Spartanburg at 15.0%.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Grand junction Spartanburg
No Schooling 0.4% (245) 1.0% (384)
High School Diploma 13.9% (9,476) 15.9% (6,118)
Less than High School 9.7% (6,605) 11.2% (4,339)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 23.8% (16,201) 21.3% (8,205)

Education Levels Comparison: Grand junction vs Spartanburg

  • In Spartanburg, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.4% in Grand junction.
  • In Spartanburg, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.9% compared to 13.9% in Grand junction.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Spartanburg at 11.2%, compared to 9.7% in Grand junction.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Grand junction hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.8% compared to 21.3% in Spartanburg.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.