Demographics details for Grand junction, CO vs Parnell, MO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Grand junction, CO vs Parnell, MO.
Data | Grand junction | Parnell |
---|---|---|
Population | 68,034 | 134 |
Median Age | 39.9 years | 31.5 years |
Median Income | $62,993 | $38,393 |
Married Families | 35.0% | 51.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.7 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Grand junction vs Parnell
- In Grand junction, the population is higher at 68,034, compared to 134 in Parnell.
- Residents in Grand junction have a higher median age of 39.9 years compared to 31.5 years in Parnell.
- Grand junction has a higher median income of $62,993 compared to $38,393 in Parnell.
- In Parnell, the percentage of married families is higher at 51.0%, compared to 35.0% in Grand junction.
- The poverty level is identical in both Grand junction and Parnell at 10%.
- The unemployment rate in Grand junction is higher at 4.7%, compared to 3.2% in Parnell.
Demographics
Demographics Grand junction vs Parnell provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Grand junction | Parnell |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | Data is updating |
White | 73 | 69 |
Asian | 1 | 1 |
Hispanic | 16 | 9 |
Two or More Races | 8 | 21 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Grand junction vs Parnell
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Grand junction at 1% compared to 0% in Parnell.
- Grand junction has a higher percentage of White residents at 73% compared to 69% in Parnell.
- Both Grand junction and Parnell have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Grand junction at 16% compared to 9% in Parnell.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Parnell at 21%, compared to 8% in Grand junction.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Grand junction at 1% compared to 0% in Parnell.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Grand junction | Parnell |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.8% | 18.5% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.8% | 13.3% |
Depression | 24.5% | 24.2% |
Smoking | 17.3% | 22.0% |
Binge Drinking | 19.2% | 18.2% |
Obesity | 29.2% | 39.7% |
Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 24.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Grand junction vs Parnell
- In Parnell, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.5% compared to 17.8% in Grand junction.
- Depression is more prevalent in Grand junction at 24.5% compared to 24.2% in Parnell.
- Parnell has a higher smoking rate at 22.0% compared to 17.3% in Grand junction.
- Binge drinking is more common in Grand junction at 19.2% compared to 18.2% in Parnell.
- Parnell has higher obesity rates at 39.7% compared to 29.2% in Grand junction.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Parnell at 24.0% compared to 15.0% in Grand junction.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Grand junction | Parnell |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.4% (245) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 13.9% (9,476) | 46.3% (62) |
Less than High School | 9.7% (6,605) | 7.5% (10) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 23.8% (16,201) | 11.2% (15) |
Education Levels Comparison: Grand junction vs Parnell
- A higher percentage of residents in Grand junction have no formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.0% in Parnell.
- In Parnell, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 46.3% compared to 13.9% in Grand junction.
- More residents in Grand junction have less than a high school education at 9.7% compared to 7.5% in Parnell.
- A higher percentage of residents in Grand junction hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.8% compared to 11.2% in Parnell.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.