Demographics details for Grand junction, CO vs Middle river, MD

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Grand junction, CO vs Middle river, MD.

Data Grand junction Middle river
Population 68,034 31,155
Median Age 39.9 years 36.7 years
Median Income $62,993 $72,970
Married Families 35.0% 33.0%
Poverty Level 10% 8%
Unemployment Rate 4.7 4.0

Population Comparison: Grand junction vs Middle river

  • In Grand junction, the population is higher at 68,034, compared to 31,155 in Middle river.
  • Residents in Grand junction have a higher median age of 39.9 years compared to 36.7 years in Middle river.
  • Middle river has a higher median income of $72,970, compared to $62,993 in Grand junction.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Grand junction at 35.0% compared to 33.0% in Middle river.
  • Grand junction has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 8% in Middle river.
  • The unemployment rate in Grand junction is higher at 4.7%, compared to 4.0% in Middle river.

Demographics

Demographics Grand junction vs Middle river provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Grand junction Middle river
Black 1 29
White 73 51
Asian 1 7
Hispanic 16 8
Two or More Races 8 5
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Grand junction vs Middle river

  • In Middle river, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 29% compared to 1% in Grand junction.
  • Grand junction has a higher percentage of White residents at 73% compared to 51% in Middle river.
  • In Middle river, the Asian population stands at 7%, greater than 1% in Grand junction.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Grand junction at 16% compared to 8% in Middle river.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Grand junction at 8% compared to 5% in Middle river.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Grand junction at 1% compared to 0% in Middle river.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Grand junction Middle river
Mental Health Not Good 17.8% 17.8%
Physical Health Not Good 11.8% 11.1%
Depression 24.5% 24.1%
Smoking 17.3% 17.2%
Binge Drinking 19.2% 15.0%
Obesity 29.2% 38.7%
Disability Percentage 15.0% 14.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Grand junction vs Middle river

  • Poor mental health levels are equal in both Grand junction and Middle river at 17.8%.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Grand junction at 24.5% compared to 24.1% in Middle river.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Grand junction at 17.3% compared to 17.2% in Middle river.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Grand junction at 19.2% compared to 15.0% in Middle river.
  • Middle river has higher obesity rates at 38.7% compared to 29.2% in Grand junction.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Grand junction at 15.0% compared to 14.0% in Middle river.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Grand junction Middle river
No Schooling 0.4% (245) 2.6% (818)
High School Diploma 13.9% (9,476) 20.1% (6,254)
Less than High School 9.7% (6,605) 14.8% (4,616)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 23.8% (16,201) 19.4% (6,048)

Education Levels Comparison: Grand junction vs Middle river

  • In Middle river, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.6% compared to 0.4% in Grand junction.
  • In Middle river, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 20.1% compared to 13.9% in Grand junction.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Middle river at 14.8%, compared to 9.7% in Grand junction.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Grand junction hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.8% compared to 19.4% in Middle river.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.