Demographics details for Grand junction, CO vs Hanover, NH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Grand junction, CO vs Hanover, NH.
Data | Grand junction | Hanover |
---|---|---|
Population | 68,034 | 8,234 |
Median Age | 39.9 years | 22.0 years |
Median Income | $62,993 | $111,958 |
Married Families | 35.0% | 30.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 14% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.7 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Grand junction vs Hanover
- In Grand junction, the population is higher at 68,034, compared to 8,234 in Hanover.
- Residents in Grand junction have a higher median age of 39.9 years compared to 22.0 years in Hanover.
- Hanover has a higher median income of $111,958, compared to $62,993 in Grand junction.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Grand junction at 35.0% compared to 30.0% in Hanover.
- The poverty level is higher in Hanover at 14%, compared to 10% in Grand junction.
- The unemployment rate in Grand junction is higher at 4.7%, compared to 2.5% in Hanover.
Demographics
Demographics Grand junction vs Hanover provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Grand junction | Hanover |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 5 |
White | 73 | 68 |
Asian | 1 | 11 |
Hispanic | 16 | 6 |
Two or More Races | 8 | 10 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Grand junction vs Hanover
- In Hanover, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 1% in Grand junction.
- Grand junction has a higher percentage of White residents at 73% compared to 68% in Hanover.
- In Hanover, the Asian population stands at 11%, greater than 1% in Grand junction.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Grand junction at 16% compared to 6% in Hanover.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Hanover at 10%, compared to 8% in Grand junction.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Grand junction at 1% compared to 0% in Hanover.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Grand junction | Hanover |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.8% | 13.9% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.8% | 8.3% |
Depression | 24.5% | 23.1% |
Smoking | 17.3% | 11.8% |
Binge Drinking | 19.2% | 16.8% |
Obesity | 29.2% | 27.7% |
Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 6.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Grand junction vs Hanover
- More residents in Grand junction report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 13.9% in Hanover.
- Depression is more prevalent in Grand junction at 24.5% compared to 23.1% in Hanover.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Grand junction at 17.3% compared to 11.8% in Hanover.
- Binge drinking is more common in Grand junction at 19.2% compared to 16.8% in Hanover.
- Obesity rates are higher in Grand junction at 29.2% compared to 27.7% in Hanover.
- Disability percentages are higher in Grand junction at 15.0% compared to 6.0% in Hanover.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Grand junction | Hanover |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.4% (245) | 0.2% (20) |
High School Diploma | 13.9% (9,476) | 1.2% (102) |
Less than High School | 9.7% (6,605) | 1.7% (143) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 23.8% (16,201) | 39.4% (3,242) |
Education Levels Comparison: Grand junction vs Hanover
- A higher percentage of residents in Grand junction have no formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.2% in Hanover.
- A higher percentage of residents in Grand junction hold a high school diploma at 13.9% compared to 1.2% in Hanover.
- More residents in Grand junction have less than a high school education at 9.7% compared to 1.7% in Hanover.
- In Hanover, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 39.4% compared to 23.8% in Grand junction.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.