Demographics details for Grand junction, CO vs Foster, OK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Grand junction, CO vs Foster, OK.
| Data | Grand junction | Foster |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 68,034 | 247 |
| Median Age | 39.9 years | 38.8 years |
| Median Income | $62,993 | $68,871 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 47.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.7 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Grand junction vs Foster
- In Grand junction, the population is higher at 68,034, compared to 247 in Foster.
- Residents in Grand junction have a higher median age of 39.9 years compared to 38.8 years in Foster.
- Foster has a higher median income of $68,871, compared to $62,993 in Grand junction.
- In Foster, the percentage of married families is higher at 47.0%, compared to 35.0% in Grand junction.
- The poverty level is higher in Foster at 12%, compared to 10% in Grand junction.
- The unemployment rate in Grand junction is higher at 4.7%, compared to 2.5% in Foster.
Demographics
Demographics Grand junction vs Foster provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Grand junction | Foster |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | Data is updating |
| White | 73 | 73 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 16 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 20 |
| American Indian | 1 | 7 |
Demographics Comparison: Grand junction vs Foster
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Grand junction at 1% compared to 0% in Foster.
- The percentage of White residents is the same in both Grand junction and Foster at 73%.
- The Asian population is larger in Grand junction at 1% compared to 0% in Foster.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Grand junction at 16% compared to 0% in Foster.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Foster at 20%, compared to 8% in Grand junction.
- In Foster, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 7%, compared to 1% in Grand junction.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Grand junction | Foster |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.8% | 18.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.8% | 12.9% |
| Depression | 24.5% | 24.7% |
| Smoking | 17.3% | 21.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.2% | 15.3% |
| Obesity | 29.2% | 41.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Grand junction vs Foster
- In Foster, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.5% compared to 17.8% in Grand junction.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Foster at 24.7% versus 24.5% in Grand junction.
- Foster has a higher smoking rate at 21.6% compared to 17.3% in Grand junction.
- Binge drinking is more common in Grand junction at 19.2% compared to 15.3% in Foster.
- Foster has higher obesity rates at 41.9% compared to 29.2% in Grand junction.
- Disability percentages are higher in Grand junction at 15.0% compared to 13.0% in Foster.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Grand junction | Foster |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (245) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 13.9% (9,476) | 30.4% (75) |
| Less than High School | 9.7% (6,605) | 8.1% (20) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 23.8% (16,201) | 22.3% (55) |
Education Levels Comparison: Grand junction vs Foster
- A higher percentage of residents in Grand junction have no formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.0% in Foster.
- In Foster, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 30.4% compared to 13.9% in Grand junction.
- More residents in Grand junction have less than a high school education at 9.7% compared to 8.1% in Foster.
- A higher percentage of residents in Grand junction hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.8% compared to 22.3% in Foster.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.