Demographics details for Grand junction, CO vs Crystal lake, IL

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Grand junction, CO vs Crystal lake, IL.

Data Grand junction Crystal lake
Population 68,034 40,661
Median Age 39.9 years 39.9 years
Median Income $62,993 $103,018
Married Families 35.0% 46.0%
Poverty Level 10% 5%
Unemployment Rate 4.7 5.4

Population Comparison: Grand junction vs Crystal lake

  • In Grand junction, the population is higher at 68,034, compared to 40,661 in Crystal lake.
  • The median age is the same in both Grand junction and Crystal lake at 39.9 years.
  • Crystal lake has a higher median income of $103,018, compared to $62,993 in Grand junction.
  • In Crystal lake, the percentage of married families is higher at 46.0%, compared to 35.0% in Grand junction.
  • Grand junction has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 5% in Crystal lake.
  • Crystal lake has a higher unemployment rate at 5.4% compared to 4.7% in Grand junction.

Demographics

Demographics Grand junction vs Crystal lake provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Grand junction Crystal lake
Black 1 1
White 73 79
Asian 1 4
Hispanic 16 11
Two or More Races 8 5
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Grand junction vs Crystal lake

  • The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Grand junction and Crystal lake at 1%.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Crystal lake at 79% compared to 73% in Grand junction.
  • In Crystal lake, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 1% in Grand junction.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Grand junction at 16% compared to 11% in Crystal lake.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Grand junction at 8% compared to 5% in Crystal lake.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Grand junction at 1% compared to 0% in Crystal lake.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Grand junction Crystal lake
Mental Health Not Good 17.8% 14.0%
Physical Health Not Good 11.8% 8.9%
Depression 24.5% 19.6%
Smoking 17.3% 12.3%
Binge Drinking 19.2% 18.9%
Obesity 29.2% 29.5%
Disability Percentage 15.0% 9.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Grand junction vs Crystal lake

  • More residents in Grand junction report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 14.0% in Crystal lake.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Grand junction at 24.5% compared to 19.6% in Crystal lake.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Grand junction at 17.3% compared to 12.3% in Crystal lake.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Grand junction at 19.2% compared to 18.9% in Crystal lake.
  • Crystal lake has higher obesity rates at 29.5% compared to 29.2% in Grand junction.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Grand junction at 15.0% compared to 9.0% in Crystal lake.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Grand junction Crystal lake
No Schooling 0.4% (245) 0.2% (95)
High School Diploma 13.9% (9,476) 13.8% (5,614)
Less than High School 9.7% (6,605) 5.8% (2,362)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 23.8% (16,201) 27.1% (11,028)

Education Levels Comparison: Grand junction vs Crystal lake

  • A higher percentage of residents in Grand junction have no formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.2% in Crystal lake.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Grand junction hold a high school diploma at 13.9% compared to 13.8% in Crystal lake.
  • More residents in Grand junction have less than a high school education at 9.7% compared to 5.8% in Crystal lake.
  • In Crystal lake, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 27.1% compared to 23.8% in Grand junction.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.