Demographics details for Grand junction, CO vs Cross city, FL

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Grand junction, CO vs Cross city, FL.

Data Grand junction Cross city
Population 68,034 1,754
Median Age 39.9 years 40.2 years
Median Income $62,993 $44,500
Married Families 35.0% 47.0%
Poverty Level 10% 18%
Unemployment Rate 4.7 3.5

Population Comparison: Grand junction vs Cross city

  • In Grand junction, the population is higher at 68,034, compared to 1,754 in Cross city.
  • The median age in Cross city is higher at 40.2 years, compared to 39.9 years in Grand junction.
  • Grand junction has a higher median income of $62,993 compared to $44,500 in Cross city.
  • In Cross city, the percentage of married families is higher at 47.0%, compared to 35.0% in Grand junction.
  • The poverty level is higher in Cross city at 18%, compared to 10% in Grand junction.
  • The unemployment rate in Grand junction is higher at 4.7%, compared to 3.5% in Cross city.

Demographics

Demographics Grand junction vs Cross city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Grand junction Cross city
Black 1 20
White 73 61
Asian 1 2
Hispanic 16 9
Two or More Races 8 8
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Grand junction vs Cross city

  • In Cross city, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 20% compared to 1% in Grand junction.
  • Grand junction has a higher percentage of White residents at 73% compared to 61% in Cross city.
  • In Cross city, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in Grand junction.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Grand junction at 16% compared to 9% in Cross city.
  • Both Grand junction and Cross city have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 8%.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Grand junction at 1% compared to 0% in Cross city.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Grand junction Cross city
Mental Health Not Good 17.8% 20.0%
Physical Health Not Good 11.8% 15.8%
Depression 24.5% 23.8%
Smoking 17.3% 29.1%
Binge Drinking 19.2% 14.8%
Obesity 29.2% 40.8%
Disability Percentage 15.0% 32.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Grand junction vs Cross city

  • In Cross city, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.0% compared to 17.8% in Grand junction.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Grand junction at 24.5% compared to 23.8% in Cross city.
  • Cross city has a higher smoking rate at 29.1% compared to 17.3% in Grand junction.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Grand junction at 19.2% compared to 14.8% in Cross city.
  • Cross city has higher obesity rates at 40.8% compared to 29.2% in Grand junction.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Cross city at 32.0% compared to 15.0% in Grand junction.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Grand junction Cross city
No Schooling 0.4% (245) 0.9% (15)
High School Diploma 13.9% (9,476) 39.2% (688)
Less than High School 9.7% (6,605) 11.7% (205)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 23.8% (16,201) 7.8% (136)

Education Levels Comparison: Grand junction vs Cross city

  • In Cross city, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.4% in Grand junction.
  • In Cross city, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 39.2% compared to 13.9% in Grand junction.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Cross city at 11.7%, compared to 9.7% in Grand junction.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Grand junction hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.8% compared to 7.8% in Cross city.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.