Demographics details for Grand junction, CO vs Columbus, MS

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Grand junction, CO vs Columbus, MS.

Data Grand junction Columbus
Population 68,034 23,273
Median Age 39.9 years 38.5 years
Median Income $62,993 $38,954
Married Families 35.0% 25.0%
Poverty Level 10% 19%
Unemployment Rate 4.7 3.8

Population Comparison: Grand junction vs Columbus

  • In Grand junction, the population is higher at 68,034, compared to 23,273 in Columbus.
  • Residents in Grand junction have a higher median age of 39.9 years compared to 38.5 years in Columbus.
  • Grand junction has a higher median income of $62,993 compared to $38,954 in Columbus.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Grand junction at 35.0% compared to 25.0% in Columbus.
  • The poverty level is higher in Columbus at 19%, compared to 10% in Grand junction.
  • The unemployment rate in Grand junction is higher at 4.7%, compared to 3.8% in Columbus.

Demographics

Demographics Grand junction vs Columbus provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Grand junction Columbus
Black 1 66
White 73 28
Asian 1 2
Hispanic 16 2
Two or More Races 8 2
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Grand junction vs Columbus

  • In Columbus, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 66% compared to 1% in Grand junction.
  • Grand junction has a higher percentage of White residents at 73% compared to 28% in Columbus.
  • In Columbus, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in Grand junction.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Grand junction at 16% compared to 2% in Columbus.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Grand junction at 8% compared to 2% in Columbus.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Grand junction at 1% compared to 0% in Columbus.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Grand junction Columbus
Mental Health Not Good 17.8% 17.4%
Physical Health Not Good 11.8% 13.6%
Depression 24.5% 20.0%
Smoking 17.3% 21.0%
Binge Drinking 19.2% 11.8%
Obesity 29.2% 44.8%
Disability Percentage 15.0% 12.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Grand junction vs Columbus

  • More residents in Grand junction report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 17.4% in Columbus.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Grand junction at 24.5% compared to 20.0% in Columbus.
  • Columbus has a higher smoking rate at 21.0% compared to 17.3% in Grand junction.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Grand junction at 19.2% compared to 11.8% in Columbus.
  • Columbus has higher obesity rates at 44.8% compared to 29.2% in Grand junction.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Grand junction at 15.0% compared to 12.0% in Columbus.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Grand junction Columbus
No Schooling 0.4% (245) 1.1% (260)
High School Diploma 13.9% (9,476) 18.4% (4,272)
Less than High School 9.7% (6,605) 11.0% (2,559)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 23.8% (16,201) 17.1% (3,971)

Education Levels Comparison: Grand junction vs Columbus

  • In Columbus, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.4% in Grand junction.
  • In Columbus, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.4% compared to 13.9% in Grand junction.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Columbus at 11.0%, compared to 9.7% in Grand junction.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Grand junction hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.8% compared to 17.1% in Columbus.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.