Demographics details for Grand island, NE vs Sloughhouse, CA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Grand island, NE vs Sloughhouse, CA.

Data Grand island Sloughhouse
Population 52,513 7,135
Median Age 35.0 years 54.6 years
Median Income $59,061 $124,900
Married Families 37.0% 55.0%
Poverty Level 10% 6%
Unemployment Rate 3.1 3.2

Population Comparison: Grand island vs Sloughhouse

  • In Grand island, the population is higher at 52,513, compared to 7,135 in Sloughhouse.
  • The median age in Sloughhouse is higher at 54.6 years, compared to 35.0 years in Grand island.
  • Sloughhouse has a higher median income of $124,900, compared to $59,061 in Grand island.
  • In Sloughhouse, the percentage of married families is higher at 55.0%, compared to 37.0% in Grand island.
  • Grand island has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 6% in Sloughhouse.
  • Sloughhouse has a higher unemployment rate at 3.2% compared to 3.1% in Grand island.

Demographics

Demographics Grand island vs Sloughhouse provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Grand island Sloughhouse
Black 4 5
White 52 57
Asian 1 8
Hispanic 34 20
Two or More Races 8 9
American Indian 1 1

Demographics Comparison: Grand island vs Sloughhouse

  • In Sloughhouse, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 4% in Grand island.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Sloughhouse at 57% compared to 52% in Grand island.
  • In Sloughhouse, the Asian population stands at 8%, greater than 1% in Grand island.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Grand island at 34% compared to 20% in Sloughhouse.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Sloughhouse at 9%, compared to 8% in Grand island.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Grand island and Sloughhouse at 1%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Grand island Sloughhouse
Mental Health Not Good 14.2% Data is updating%
Physical Health Not Good 10.8% Data is updating%
Depression 17.0% Data is updating%
Smoking 16.8% Data is updating%
Binge Drinking 18.2% Data is updating%
Obesity 41.0% Data is updating%
Disability Percentage 13.0% 13.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Grand island vs Sloughhouse

  • More residents in Grand island report poor mental health at 14.2% compared to 0.0% in Sloughhouse.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Grand island at 17.0% compared to 0.0% in Sloughhouse.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Grand island at 16.8% compared to 0.0% in Sloughhouse.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Grand island at 18.2% compared to 0.0% in Sloughhouse.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Grand island at 41.0% compared to 0.0% in Sloughhouse.
  • Disability percentages are the same in both Grand island and Sloughhouse at 13.0%.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Grand island Sloughhouse
No Schooling 2.8% (1,457) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 16.6% (8,733) 7.2% (516)
Less than High School 20.3% (10,649) 9.0% (640)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 13.3% (6,981) 35.7% (2,545)

Education Levels Comparison: Grand island vs Sloughhouse

  • A higher percentage of residents in Grand island have no formal schooling at 2.8% compared to 0.0% in Sloughhouse.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Grand island hold a high school diploma at 16.6% compared to 7.2% in Sloughhouse.
  • More residents in Grand island have less than a high school education at 20.3% compared to 9.0% in Sloughhouse.
  • In Sloughhouse, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 35.7% compared to 13.3% in Grand island.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.