Demographics details for Grand island, NE vs Kearny, NJ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Grand island, NE vs Kearny, NJ.
Data | Grand island | Kearny |
---|---|---|
Population | 52,513 | 39,862 |
Median Age | 35.0 years | 39.1 years |
Median Income | $59,061 | $81,307 |
Married Families | 37.0% | 41.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 11% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.1 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Grand island vs Kearny
- In Grand island, the population is higher at 52,513, compared to 39,862 in Kearny.
- The median age in Kearny is higher at 39.1 years, compared to 35.0 years in Grand island.
- Kearny has a higher median income of $81,307, compared to $59,061 in Grand island.
- In Kearny, the percentage of married families is higher at 41.0%, compared to 37.0% in Grand island.
- The poverty level is higher in Kearny at 11%, compared to 10% in Grand island.
- Kearny has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 3.1% in Grand island.
Demographics
Demographics Grand island vs Kearny provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Grand island | Kearny |
---|---|---|
Black | 4 | 5 |
White | 52 | 15 |
Asian | 1 | 4 |
Hispanic | 34 | 56 |
Two or More Races | 8 | 20 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Grand island vs Kearny
- In Kearny, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 4% in Grand island.
- Grand island has a higher percentage of White residents at 52% compared to 15% in Kearny.
- In Kearny, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 1% in Grand island.
- Kearny has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 56%, compared to 34% in Grand island.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Kearny at 20%, compared to 8% in Grand island.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Grand island at 1% compared to 0% in Kearny.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Grand island | Kearny |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 14.2% | 15.0% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.8% | 11.5% |
Depression | 17.0% | 19.3% |
Smoking | 16.8% | 14.6% |
Binge Drinking | 18.2% | 17.0% |
Obesity | 41.0% | 26.4% |
Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Grand island vs Kearny
- In Kearny, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.0% compared to 14.2% in Grand island.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Kearny at 19.3% versus 17.0% in Grand island.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Grand island at 16.8% compared to 14.6% in Kearny.
- Binge drinking is more common in Grand island at 18.2% compared to 17.0% in Kearny.
- Obesity rates are higher in Grand island at 41.0% compared to 26.4% in Kearny.
- Disability percentages are higher in Grand island at 13.0% compared to 8.0% in Kearny.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Grand island | Kearny |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.8% (1,457) | 2.3% (899) |
High School Diploma | 16.6% (8,733) | 21.9% (8,719) |
Less than High School | 20.3% (10,649) | 22.3% (8,901) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.3% (6,981) | 21.1% (8,419) |
Education Levels Comparison: Grand island vs Kearny
- A higher percentage of residents in Grand island have no formal schooling at 2.8% compared to 2.3% in Kearny.
- In Kearny, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.9% compared to 16.6% in Grand island.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Kearny at 22.3%, compared to 20.3% in Grand island.
- In Kearny, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.1% compared to 13.3% in Grand island.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.