Demographics details for Grand island, NE vs Griffin, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Grand island, NE vs Griffin, GA.
| Data | Grand island | Griffin |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 52,513 | 23,693 |
| Median Age | 35.0 years | 33.2 years |
| Median Income | $59,061 | $42,047 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 26.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.1 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Grand island vs Griffin
- In Grand island, the population is higher at 52,513, compared to 23,693 in Griffin.
- Residents in Grand island have a higher median age of 35.0 years compared to 33.2 years in Griffin.
- Grand island has a higher median income of $59,061 compared to $42,047 in Griffin.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Grand island at 37.0% compared to 26.0% in Griffin.
- The poverty level is higher in Griffin at 15%, compared to 10% in Grand island.
- Griffin has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.1% in Grand island.
Demographics
Demographics Grand island vs Griffin provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Grand island | Griffin |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | 52 |
| White | 52 | 36 |
| Asian | 1 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 34 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 5 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Grand island vs Griffin
- In Griffin, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 52% compared to 4% in Grand island.
- Grand island has a higher percentage of White residents at 52% compared to 36% in Griffin.
- Both Grand island and Griffin have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Grand island at 34% compared to 5% in Griffin.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Grand island at 8% compared to 5% in Griffin.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Grand island and Griffin at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Grand island | Griffin |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.2% | 18.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.8% | 14.6% |
| Depression | 17.0% | 19.7% |
| Smoking | 16.8% | 22.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.2% | 13.4% |
| Obesity | 41.0% | 38.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Grand island vs Griffin
- In Griffin, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.8% compared to 14.2% in Grand island.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Griffin at 19.7% versus 17.0% in Grand island.
- Griffin has a higher smoking rate at 22.4% compared to 16.8% in Grand island.
- Binge drinking is more common in Grand island at 18.2% compared to 13.4% in Griffin.
- Obesity rates are higher in Grand island at 41.0% compared to 38.8% in Griffin.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Grand island and Griffin at 13.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Grand island | Griffin |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.8% (1,457) | 2.2% (517) |
| High School Diploma | 16.6% (8,733) | 22.6% (5,347) |
| Less than High School | 20.3% (10,649) | 16.3% (3,859) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.3% (6,981) | 11.9% (2,819) |
Education Levels Comparison: Grand island vs Griffin
- A higher percentage of residents in Grand island have no formal schooling at 2.8% compared to 2.2% in Griffin.
- In Griffin, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.6% compared to 16.6% in Grand island.
- More residents in Grand island have less than a high school education at 20.3% compared to 16.3% in Griffin.
- A higher percentage of residents in Grand island hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.3% compared to 11.9% in Griffin.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.