Demographics details for Graham, NC vs Siloam springs, AR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Graham, NC vs Siloam springs, AR.
| Data | Graham | Siloam springs |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 17,856 | 18,654 |
| Median Age | 36.8 years | 30.1 years |
| Median Income | $51,482 | $59,911 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Graham vs Siloam springs
- The population in Siloam springs is higher at 18,654, compared to 17,856 in Graham.
- Residents in Graham have a higher median age of 36.8 years compared to 30.1 years in Siloam springs.
- Siloam springs has a higher median income of $59,911, compared to $51,482 in Graham.
- In Siloam springs, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 34.0% in Graham.
- The poverty level is higher in Siloam springs at 13%, compared to 10% in Graham.
- The unemployment rate in Graham is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.5% in Siloam springs.
Demographics
Demographics Graham vs Siloam springs provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Graham | Siloam springs |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 23 | 1 |
| White | 51 | 50 |
| Asian | 1 | 3 |
| Hispanic | 17 | 23 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 20 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 3 |
Demographics Comparison: Graham vs Siloam springs
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Graham at 23% compared to 1% in Siloam springs.
- Graham has a higher percentage of White residents at 51% compared to 50% in Siloam springs.
- In Siloam springs, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 1% in Graham.
- Siloam springs has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 23%, compared to 17% in Graham.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Siloam springs at 20%, compared to 8% in Graham.
- In Siloam springs, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 3%, compared to 0% in Graham.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Graham | Siloam springs |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.3% | 20.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.2% | 15.0% |
| Depression | 25.2% | 26.0% |
| Smoking | 20.5% | 21.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.9% | 14.9% |
| Obesity | 38.9% | 39.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Graham vs Siloam springs
- In Siloam springs, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.0% compared to 18.3% in Graham.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Siloam springs at 26.0% versus 25.2% in Graham.
- Siloam springs has a higher smoking rate at 21.6% compared to 20.5% in Graham.
- Binge drinking is more common in Graham at 15.9% compared to 14.9% in Siloam springs.
- Siloam springs has higher obesity rates at 39.2% compared to 38.9% in Graham.
- Disability percentages are higher in Graham at 14.0% compared to 13.0% in Siloam springs.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Graham | Siloam springs |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.3% (227) | 3.7% (681) |
| High School Diploma | 16.7% (2,976) | 13.5% (2,510) |
| Less than High School | 16.2% (2,884) | 17.4% (3,249) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.6% (2,610) | 14.4% (2,680) |
Education Levels Comparison: Graham vs Siloam springs
- In Siloam springs, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.7% compared to 1.3% in Graham.
- A higher percentage of residents in Graham hold a high school diploma at 16.7% compared to 13.5% in Siloam springs.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Siloam springs at 17.4%, compared to 16.2% in Graham.
- A higher percentage of residents in Graham hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.6% compared to 14.4% in Siloam springs.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.