Demographics details for Graham, NC vs Salt lake city, UT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Graham, NC vs Salt lake city, UT.
Data | Graham | Salt lake city |
---|---|---|
Population | 17,856 | 204,657 |
Median Age | 36.8 years | 32.5 years |
Median Income | $51,482 | $72,357 |
Married Families | 34.0% | 33.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 13% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Graham vs Salt lake city
- The population in Salt lake city is higher at 204,657, compared to 17,856 in Graham.
- Residents in Graham have a higher median age of 36.8 years compared to 32.5 years in Salt lake city.
- Salt lake city has a higher median income of $72,357, compared to $51,482 in Graham.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Graham at 34.0% compared to 33.0% in Salt lake city.
- The poverty level is higher in Salt lake city at 13%, compared to 10% in Graham.
- The unemployment rate in Graham is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.5% in Salt lake city.
Demographics
Demographics Graham vs Salt lake city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Graham | Salt lake city |
---|---|---|
Black | 23 | 3 |
White | 51 | 63 |
Asian | 1 | 5 |
Hispanic | 17 | 20 |
Two or More Races | 8 | 8 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Graham vs Salt lake city
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Graham at 23% compared to 3% in Salt lake city.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Salt lake city at 63% compared to 51% in Graham.
- In Salt lake city, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 1% in Graham.
- Salt lake city has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 20%, compared to 17% in Graham.
- Both Graham and Salt lake city have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 8%.
- In Salt lake city, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Graham.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Graham | Salt lake city |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.3% | 18.0% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.2% | 11.1% |
Depression | 25.2% | 26.2% |
Smoking | 20.5% | 9.2% |
Binge Drinking | 15.9% | 14.8% |
Obesity | 38.9% | 31.8% |
Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Graham vs Salt lake city
- More residents in Graham report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 18.0% in Salt lake city.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Salt lake city at 26.2% versus 25.2% in Graham.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Graham at 20.5% compared to 9.2% in Salt lake city.
- Binge drinking is more common in Graham at 15.9% compared to 14.8% in Salt lake city.
- Obesity rates are higher in Graham at 38.9% compared to 31.8% in Salt lake city.
- Disability percentages are higher in Graham at 14.0% compared to 11.0% in Salt lake city.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Graham | Salt lake city |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.3% (227) | 1.3% (2,733) |
High School Diploma | 16.7% (2,976) | 9.3% (19,020) |
Less than High School | 16.2% (2,884) | 10.5% (21,475) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.6% (2,610) | 33.0% (67,504) |
Education Levels Comparison: Graham vs Salt lake city
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Graham and Salt lake city at 1.3%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Graham hold a high school diploma at 16.7% compared to 9.3% in Salt lake city.
- More residents in Graham have less than a high school education at 16.2% compared to 10.5% in Salt lake city.
- In Salt lake city, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 33.0% compared to 14.6% in Graham.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.