Demographics details for Graham, NC vs Averill park, NY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Graham, NC vs Averill park, NY.
| Data | Graham | Averill park |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 17,856 | 1,608 |
| Median Age | 36.8 years | 53.3 years |
| Median Income | $51,482 | $109,746 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 50.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 4% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Graham vs Averill park
- In Graham, the population is higher at 17,856, compared to 1,608 in Averill park.
- The median age in Averill park is higher at 53.3 years, compared to 36.8 years in Graham.
- Averill park has a higher median income of $109,746, compared to $51,482 in Graham.
- In Averill park, the percentage of married families is higher at 50.0%, compared to 34.0% in Graham.
- Graham has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 4% in Averill park.
- The unemployment rate in Graham is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.5% in Averill park.
Demographics
Demographics Graham vs Averill park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Graham | Averill park |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 23 | Data is updating |
| White | 51 | 100 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 17 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 8 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Graham vs Averill park
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Graham at 23% compared to 0% in Averill park.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Averill park at 100% compared to 51% in Graham.
- The Asian population is larger in Graham at 1% compared to 0% in Averill park.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Graham at 17% compared to 0% in Averill park.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Graham at 8% compared to 0% in Averill park.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Graham and Averill park at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Graham | Averill park |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.3% | 14.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.2% | 9.1% |
| Depression | 25.2% | 23.7% |
| Smoking | 20.5% | 15.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.9% | 21.5% |
| Obesity | 38.9% | 34.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Graham vs Averill park
- More residents in Graham report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 14.6% in Averill park.
- Depression is more prevalent in Graham at 25.2% compared to 23.7% in Averill park.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Graham at 20.5% compared to 15.9% in Averill park.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Averill park at 21.5% compared to 15.9% in Graham.
- Obesity rates are higher in Graham at 38.9% compared to 34.6% in Averill park.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Graham and Averill park at 14.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Graham | Averill park |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.3% (227) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 16.7% (2,976) | 22.0% (354) |
| Less than High School | 16.2% (2,884) | 3.7% (60) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.6% (2,610) | 32.3% (520) |
Education Levels Comparison: Graham vs Averill park
- A higher percentage of residents in Graham have no formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.0% in Averill park.
- In Averill park, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.0% compared to 16.7% in Graham.
- More residents in Graham have less than a high school education at 16.2% compared to 3.7% in Averill park.
- In Averill park, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 32.3% compared to 14.6% in Graham.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.