Demographics details for Grafton, WI vs Shafter, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Grafton, WI vs Shafter, CA.
| Data | Grafton | Shafter |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 12,433 | 21,282 |
| Median Age | 43.8 years | 27.4 years |
| Median Income | $83,500 | $66,418 |
| Married Families | 45.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | 4% | 20% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 5.1 |
Population Comparison: Grafton vs Shafter
- The population in Shafter is higher at 21,282, compared to 12,433 in Grafton.
- Residents in Grafton have a higher median age of 43.8 years compared to 27.4 years in Shafter.
- Grafton has a higher median income of $83,500 compared to $66,418 in Shafter.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Grafton at 45.0% compared to 31.0% in Shafter.
- The poverty level is higher in Shafter at 20%, compared to 4% in Grafton.
- Shafter has a higher unemployment rate at 5.1% compared to 3.2% in Grafton.
Demographics
Demographics Grafton vs Shafter provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Grafton | Shafter |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 2 |
| White | 87 | -9 |
| Asian | 2 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 4 | 78 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 27 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Grafton vs Shafter
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Grafton and Shafter at 2%.
- Grafton has a higher percentage of White residents at 87% compared to -9% in Shafter.
- The Asian population is larger in Grafton at 2% compared to 1% in Shafter.
- Shafter has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 78%, compared to 4% in Grafton.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Shafter at 27%, compared to 5% in Grafton.
- In Shafter, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Grafton.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Grafton | Shafter |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.2% | 18.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 7.9% | 16.6% |
| Depression | 21.0% | 19.7% |
| Smoking | 11.6% | 18.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 25.5% | 14.9% |
| Obesity | 28.5% | 39.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 6.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Grafton vs Shafter
- In Shafter, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.8% compared to 13.2% in Grafton.
- Depression is more prevalent in Grafton at 21.0% compared to 19.7% in Shafter.
- Shafter has a higher smoking rate at 18.3% compared to 11.6% in Grafton.
- Binge drinking is more common in Grafton at 25.5% compared to 14.9% in Shafter.
- Shafter has higher obesity rates at 39.4% compared to 28.5% in Grafton.
- Disability percentages are higher in Grafton at 10.0% compared to 6.0% in Shafter.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Grafton | Shafter |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 2.7% (567) |
| High School Diploma | 12.9% (1,600) | 14.1% (2,992) |
| Less than High School | 3.1% (384) | 32.9% (6,999) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 31.8% (3,959) | 5.7% (1,217) |
Education Levels Comparison: Grafton vs Shafter
- In Shafter, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 0.0% in Grafton.
- In Shafter, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 14.1% compared to 12.9% in Grafton.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Shafter at 32.9%, compared to 3.1% in Grafton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Grafton hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 31.8% compared to 5.7% in Shafter.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.