Demographics details for Grafton, WI vs Saint marks, FL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Grafton, WI vs Saint marks, FL.
Data | Grafton | Saint marks |
---|---|---|
Population | 12,433 | 295 |
Median Age | 43.8 years | 60.1 years |
Median Income | $83,500 | $47,500 |
Married Families | 45.0% | 51.0% |
Poverty Level | 4% | Data is updating |
Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Grafton vs Saint marks
- In Grafton, the population is higher at 12,433, compared to 295 in Saint marks.
- The median age in Saint marks is higher at 60.1 years, compared to 43.8 years in Grafton.
- Grafton has a higher median income of $83,500 compared to $47,500 in Saint marks.
- In Saint marks, the percentage of married families is higher at 51.0%, compared to 45.0% in Grafton.
- Grafton has a higher poverty level at 4% compared to 0% in Saint marks.
- Saint marks has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.2% in Grafton.
Demographics
Demographics Grafton vs Saint marks provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Grafton | Saint marks |
---|---|---|
Black | 2 | Data is updating |
White | 87 | 98 |
Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 4 | Data is updating |
Two or More Races | 5 | 2 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Grafton vs Saint marks
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Grafton at 2% compared to 0% in Saint marks.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Saint marks at 98% compared to 87% in Grafton.
- The Asian population is larger in Grafton at 2% compared to 0% in Saint marks.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Grafton at 4% compared to 0% in Saint marks.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Grafton at 5% compared to 2% in Saint marks.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Grafton and Saint marks at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Grafton | Saint marks |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 13.2% | 18.6% |
Physical Health Not Good | 7.9% | 12.7% |
Depression | 21.0% | 23.2% |
Smoking | 11.6% | 25.2% |
Binge Drinking | 25.5% | 17.4% |
Obesity | 28.5% | 31.9% |
Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Grafton vs Saint marks
- In Saint marks, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.6% compared to 13.2% in Grafton.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Saint marks at 23.2% versus 21.0% in Grafton.
- Saint marks has a higher smoking rate at 25.2% compared to 11.6% in Grafton.
- Binge drinking is more common in Grafton at 25.5% compared to 17.4% in Saint marks.
- Saint marks has higher obesity rates at 31.9% compared to 28.5% in Grafton.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Saint marks at 12.0% compared to 10.0% in Grafton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Grafton | Saint marks |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 12.9% (1,600) | 23.7% (70) |
Less than High School | 3.1% (384) | 9.5% (28) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 31.8% (3,959) | 4.1% (12) |
Education Levels Comparison: Grafton vs Saint marks
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Grafton and Saint marks at 0.0%.
- In Saint marks, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 23.7% compared to 12.9% in Grafton.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Saint marks at 9.5%, compared to 3.1% in Grafton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Grafton hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 31.8% compared to 4.1% in Saint marks.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.