Demographics details for Grafton, WI vs Monroe, MI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Grafton, WI vs Monroe, MI.
| Data | Grafton | Monroe |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 12,433 | 20,295 |
| Median Age | 43.8 years | 36.6 years |
| Median Income | $83,500 | $57,779 |
| Married Families | 45.0% | 33.0% |
| Poverty Level | 4% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 5.8 |
Population Comparison: Grafton vs Monroe
- The population in Monroe is higher at 20,295, compared to 12,433 in Grafton.
- Residents in Grafton have a higher median age of 43.8 years compared to 36.6 years in Monroe.
- Grafton has a higher median income of $83,500 compared to $57,779 in Monroe.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Grafton at 45.0% compared to 33.0% in Monroe.
- The poverty level is higher in Monroe at 12%, compared to 4% in Grafton.
- Monroe has a higher unemployment rate at 5.8% compared to 3.2% in Grafton.
Demographics
Demographics Grafton vs Monroe provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Grafton | Monroe |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 6 |
| White | 87 | 86 |
| Asian | 2 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 4 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Grafton vs Monroe
- In Monroe, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 6% compared to 2% in Grafton.
- Grafton has a higher percentage of White residents at 87% compared to 86% in Monroe.
- The Asian population is larger in Grafton at 2% compared to 1% in Monroe.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Grafton at 4% compared to 3% in Monroe.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Grafton at 5% compared to 4% in Monroe.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Grafton and Monroe at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Grafton | Monroe |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.2% | 19.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 7.9% | 13.2% |
| Depression | 21.0% | 25.7% |
| Smoking | 11.6% | 21.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 25.5% | 17.5% |
| Obesity | 28.5% | 43.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Grafton vs Monroe
- In Monroe, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.4% compared to 13.2% in Grafton.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Monroe at 25.7% versus 21.0% in Grafton.
- Monroe has a higher smoking rate at 21.6% compared to 11.6% in Grafton.
- Binge drinking is more common in Grafton at 25.5% compared to 17.5% in Monroe.
- Monroe has higher obesity rates at 43.7% compared to 28.5% in Grafton.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Monroe at 16.0% compared to 10.0% in Grafton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Grafton | Monroe |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.5% (105) |
| High School Diploma | 12.9% (1,600) | 17.0% (3,449) |
| Less than High School | 3.1% (384) | 13.0% (2,633) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 31.8% (3,959) | 13.2% (2,681) |
Education Levels Comparison: Grafton vs Monroe
- In Monroe, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.0% in Grafton.
- In Monroe, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.0% compared to 12.9% in Grafton.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Monroe at 13.0%, compared to 3.1% in Grafton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Grafton hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 31.8% compared to 13.2% in Monroe.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.