Demographics details for Grafton, WI vs Marshall, MI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Grafton, WI vs Marshall, MI.
| Data | Grafton | Marshall |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 12,433 | 6,753 |
| Median Age | 43.8 years | 45.4 years |
| Median Income | $83,500 | $72,813 |
| Married Families | 45.0% | 43.0% |
| Poverty Level | 4% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Grafton vs Marshall
- In Grafton, the population is higher at 12,433, compared to 6,753 in Marshall.
- The median age in Marshall is higher at 45.4 years, compared to 43.8 years in Grafton.
- Grafton has a higher median income of $83,500 compared to $72,813 in Marshall.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Grafton at 45.0% compared to 43.0% in Marshall.
- The poverty level is higher in Marshall at 9%, compared to 4% in Grafton.
- Marshall has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.2% in Grafton.
Demographics
Demographics Grafton vs Marshall provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Grafton | Marshall |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | Data is updating |
| White | 87 | 94 |
| Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 4 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 2 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Grafton vs Marshall
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Grafton at 2% compared to 0% in Marshall.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Marshall at 94% compared to 87% in Grafton.
- The Asian population is larger in Grafton at 2% compared to 0% in Marshall.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Grafton and Marshall at 4%.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Grafton at 5% compared to 2% in Marshall.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Grafton and Marshall at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Grafton | Marshall |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.2% | 17.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 7.9% | 10.6% |
| Depression | 21.0% | 25.2% |
| Smoking | 11.6% | 17.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 25.5% | 18.0% |
| Obesity | 28.5% | 37.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Grafton vs Marshall
- In Marshall, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.0% compared to 13.2% in Grafton.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Marshall at 25.2% versus 21.0% in Grafton.
- Marshall has a higher smoking rate at 17.3% compared to 11.6% in Grafton.
- Binge drinking is more common in Grafton at 25.5% compared to 18.0% in Marshall.
- Marshall has higher obesity rates at 37.5% compared to 28.5% in Grafton.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Marshall at 11.0% compared to 10.0% in Grafton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Grafton | Marshall |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.7% (46) |
| High School Diploma | 12.9% (1,600) | 15.8% (1,067) |
| Less than High School | 3.1% (384) | 7.3% (493) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 31.8% (3,959) | 33.1% (2,233) |
Education Levels Comparison: Grafton vs Marshall
- In Marshall, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.0% in Grafton.
- In Marshall, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.8% compared to 12.9% in Grafton.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Marshall at 7.3%, compared to 3.1% in Grafton.
- In Marshall, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 33.1% compared to 31.8% in Grafton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.