Demographics details for Grafton, WI vs Hattiesburg, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Grafton, WI vs Hattiesburg, MS.
Data | Grafton | Hattiesburg |
---|---|---|
Population | 12,433 | 48,455 |
Median Age | 43.8 years | 28.5 years |
Median Income | $83,500 | $41,024 |
Married Families | 45.0% | 23.0% |
Poverty Level | 4% | 23% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Grafton vs Hattiesburg
- The population in Hattiesburg is higher at 48,455, compared to 12,433 in Grafton.
- Residents in Grafton have a higher median age of 43.8 years compared to 28.5 years in Hattiesburg.
- Grafton has a higher median income of $83,500 compared to $41,024 in Hattiesburg.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Grafton at 45.0% compared to 23.0% in Hattiesburg.
- The poverty level is higher in Hattiesburg at 23%, compared to 4% in Grafton.
- Hattiesburg has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.2% in Grafton.
Demographics
Demographics Grafton vs Hattiesburg provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Grafton | Hattiesburg |
---|---|---|
Black | 2 | 52 |
White | 87 | 38 |
Asian | 2 | 1 |
Hispanic | 4 | 4 |
Two or More Races | 5 | 5 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Grafton vs Hattiesburg
- In Hattiesburg, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 52% compared to 2% in Grafton.
- Grafton has a higher percentage of White residents at 87% compared to 38% in Hattiesburg.
- The Asian population is larger in Grafton at 2% compared to 1% in Hattiesburg.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Grafton and Hattiesburg at 4%.
- Both Grafton and Hattiesburg have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 5%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Grafton and Hattiesburg at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Grafton | Hattiesburg |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 13.2% | 17.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 7.9% | 13.3% |
Depression | 21.0% | 20.7% |
Smoking | 11.6% | 20.8% |
Binge Drinking | 25.5% | 12.9% |
Obesity | 28.5% | 43.0% |
Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Grafton vs Hattiesburg
- In Hattiesburg, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.3% compared to 13.2% in Grafton.
- Depression is more prevalent in Grafton at 21.0% compared to 20.7% in Hattiesburg.
- Hattiesburg has a higher smoking rate at 20.8% compared to 11.6% in Grafton.
- Binge drinking is more common in Grafton at 25.5% compared to 12.9% in Hattiesburg.
- Hattiesburg has higher obesity rates at 43.0% compared to 28.5% in Grafton.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Hattiesburg at 19.0% compared to 10.0% in Grafton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Grafton | Hattiesburg |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.7% (362) |
High School Diploma | 12.9% (1,600) | 10.4% (5,022) |
Less than High School | 3.1% (384) | 7.5% (3,642) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 31.8% (3,959) | 20.2% (9,782) |
Education Levels Comparison: Grafton vs Hattiesburg
- In Hattiesburg, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.0% in Grafton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Grafton hold a high school diploma at 12.9% compared to 10.4% in Hattiesburg.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Hattiesburg at 7.5%, compared to 3.1% in Grafton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Grafton hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 31.8% compared to 20.2% in Hattiesburg.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.