Demographics details for Grafton, WI vs Burbank, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Grafton, WI vs Burbank, CA.
| Data | Grafton | Burbank |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 12,433 | 103,920 |
| Median Age | 43.8 years | 39.6 years |
| Median Income | $83,500 | $91,455 |
| Married Families | 45.0% | 39.0% |
| Poverty Level | 4% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 7.0 |
Population Comparison: Grafton vs Burbank
- The population in Burbank is higher at 103,920, compared to 12,433 in Grafton.
- Residents in Grafton have a higher median age of 43.8 years compared to 39.6 years in Burbank.
- Burbank has a higher median income of $91,455, compared to $83,500 in Grafton.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Grafton at 45.0% compared to 39.0% in Burbank.
- The poverty level is higher in Burbank at 11%, compared to 4% in Grafton.
- Burbank has a higher unemployment rate at 7.0% compared to 3.2% in Grafton.
Demographics
Demographics Grafton vs Burbank provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Grafton | Burbank |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 3 |
| White | 87 | 46 |
| Asian | 2 | 12 |
| Hispanic | 4 | 25 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 13 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Grafton vs Burbank
- In Burbank, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 2% in Grafton.
- Grafton has a higher percentage of White residents at 87% compared to 46% in Burbank.
- In Burbank, the Asian population stands at 12%, greater than 2% in Grafton.
- Burbank has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 25%, compared to 4% in Grafton.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Burbank at 13%, compared to 5% in Grafton.
- In Burbank, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Grafton.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Grafton | Burbank |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.2% | 14.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 7.9% | 9.7% |
| Depression | 21.0% | 16.9% |
| Smoking | 11.6% | 9.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 25.5% | 16.6% |
| Obesity | 28.5% | 26.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Grafton vs Burbank
- In Burbank, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 14.8% compared to 13.2% in Grafton.
- Depression is more prevalent in Grafton at 21.0% compared to 16.9% in Burbank.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Grafton at 11.6% compared to 9.8% in Burbank.
- Binge drinking is more common in Grafton at 25.5% compared to 16.6% in Burbank.
- Obesity rates are higher in Grafton at 28.5% compared to 26.0% in Burbank.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Burbank at 11.0% compared to 10.0% in Grafton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Grafton | Burbank |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 1.1% (1,105) |
| High School Diploma | 12.9% (1,600) | 10.3% (10,721) |
| Less than High School | 3.1% (384) | 10.0% (10,407) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 31.8% (3,959) | 33.8% (35,079) |
Education Levels Comparison: Grafton vs Burbank
- In Burbank, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.0% in Grafton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Grafton hold a high school diploma at 12.9% compared to 10.3% in Burbank.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Burbank at 10.0%, compared to 3.1% in Grafton.
- In Burbank, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 33.8% compared to 31.8% in Grafton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.