Demographics details for Graceville, FL vs Pearisburg, VA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Graceville, FL vs Pearisburg, VA.
| Data | Graceville | Pearisburg |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,175 | 2,832 |
| Median Age | 31.7 years | 46.5 years |
| Median Income | $36,625 | $70,905 |
| Married Families | 41.0% | 43.0% |
| Poverty Level | 18% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Graceville vs Pearisburg
- The population in Pearisburg is higher at 2,832, compared to 2,175 in Graceville.
- The median age in Pearisburg is higher at 46.5 years, compared to 31.7 years in Graceville.
- Pearisburg has a higher median income of $70,905, compared to $36,625 in Graceville.
- In Pearisburg, the percentage of married families is higher at 43.0%, compared to 41.0% in Graceville.
- Graceville has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 10% in Pearisburg.
- Pearisburg has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.2% in Graceville.
Demographics
Demographics Graceville vs Pearisburg provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Graceville | Pearisburg |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 32 | 10 |
| White | 59 | 89 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 6 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Graceville vs Pearisburg
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Graceville at 32% compared to 10% in Pearisburg.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Pearisburg at 89% compared to 59% in Graceville.
- The Asian population is larger in Graceville at 1% compared to 0% in Pearisburg.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Graceville at 6% compared to 1% in Pearisburg.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Graceville at 2% compared to 0% in Pearisburg.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Graceville and Pearisburg at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Graceville | Pearisburg |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.6% | 18.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.2% | 12.0% |
| Depression | 22.2% | 24.8% |
| Smoking | 24.4% | 19.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.8% | 17.8% |
| Obesity | 33.6% | 36.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Graceville vs Pearisburg
- More residents in Graceville report poor mental health at 18.6% compared to 18.2% in Pearisburg.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Pearisburg at 24.8% versus 22.2% in Graceville.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Graceville at 24.4% compared to 19.5% in Pearisburg.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Pearisburg at 17.8% compared to 15.8% in Graceville.
- Pearisburg has higher obesity rates at 36.0% compared to 33.6% in Graceville.
- Disability percentages are higher in Graceville at 18.0% compared to 14.0% in Pearisburg.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Graceville | Pearisburg |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.7% (58) | 0.7% (20) |
| High School Diploma | 25.3% (550) | 33.2% (939) |
| Less than High School | 22.5% (490) | 7.0% (199) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.2% (331) | 15.0% (426) |
Education Levels Comparison: Graceville vs Pearisburg
- A higher percentage of residents in Graceville have no formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 0.7% in Pearisburg.
- In Pearisburg, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 33.2% compared to 25.3% in Graceville.
- More residents in Graceville have less than a high school education at 22.5% compared to 7.0% in Pearisburg.
- A higher percentage of residents in Graceville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.2% compared to 15.0% in Pearisburg.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.