Demographics details for Graceville, FL vs Niobrara, NE
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Graceville, FL vs Niobrara, NE.
| Data | Graceville | Niobrara |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,175 | 363 |
| Median Age | 31.7 years | 55.1 years |
| Median Income | $36,625 | $37,452 |
| Married Families | 41.0% | 39.0% |
| Poverty Level | 18% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Graceville vs Niobrara
- In Graceville, the population is higher at 2,175, compared to 363 in Niobrara.
- The median age in Niobrara is higher at 55.1 years, compared to 31.7 years in Graceville.
- Niobrara has a higher median income of $37,452, compared to $36,625 in Graceville.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Graceville at 41.0% compared to 39.0% in Niobrara.
- Graceville has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 10% in Niobrara.
- The unemployment rate in Graceville is higher at 3.2%, compared to 2.5% in Niobrara.
Demographics
Demographics Graceville vs Niobrara provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Graceville | Niobrara |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 32 | Data is updating |
| White | 59 | 91 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 6 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 2 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 7 |
Demographics Comparison: Graceville vs Niobrara
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Graceville at 32% compared to 0% in Niobrara.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Niobrara at 91% compared to 59% in Graceville.
- The Asian population is larger in Graceville at 1% compared to 0% in Niobrara.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Graceville at 6% compared to 0% in Niobrara.
- Both Graceville and Niobrara have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 2%.
- In Niobrara, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 7%, compared to 0% in Graceville.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Graceville | Niobrara |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.6% | 14.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.2% | 10.1% |
| Depression | 22.2% | 17.7% |
| Smoking | 24.4% | 18.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.8% | 21.6% |
| Obesity | 33.6% | 40.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Graceville vs Niobrara
- More residents in Graceville report poor mental health at 18.6% compared to 14.3% in Niobrara.
- Depression is more prevalent in Graceville at 22.2% compared to 17.7% in Niobrara.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Graceville at 24.4% compared to 18.2% in Niobrara.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Niobrara at 21.6% compared to 15.8% in Graceville.
- Niobrara has higher obesity rates at 40.5% compared to 33.6% in Graceville.
- Disability percentages are higher in Graceville at 18.0% compared to 17.0% in Niobrara.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Graceville | Niobrara |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.7% (58) | 0.3% (1) |
| High School Diploma | 25.3% (550) | 26.2% (95) |
| Less than High School | 22.5% (490) | 11.3% (41) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.2% (331) | 14.3% (52) |
Education Levels Comparison: Graceville vs Niobrara
- A higher percentage of residents in Graceville have no formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 0.3% in Niobrara.
- In Niobrara, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 26.2% compared to 25.3% in Graceville.
- More residents in Graceville have less than a high school education at 22.5% compared to 11.3% in Niobrara.
- A higher percentage of residents in Graceville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.2% compared to 14.3% in Niobrara.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.