Demographics details for Graceville, FL vs Miramonte, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Graceville, FL vs Miramonte, CA.
Data | Graceville | Miramonte |
---|---|---|
Population | 2,175 | 200 |
Median Age | 31.7 years | 35.0 years |
Median Income | $36,625 | $60,000 |
Married Families | 41.0% | 50.0% |
Poverty Level | 18% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Graceville vs Miramonte
- In Graceville, the population is higher at 2,175, compared to 200 in Miramonte.
- The median age in Miramonte is higher at 35.0 years, compared to 31.7 years in Graceville.
- Miramonte has a higher median income of $60,000, compared to $36,625 in Graceville.
- In Miramonte, the percentage of married families is higher at 50.0%, compared to 41.0% in Graceville.
- Graceville has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 10% in Miramonte.
- Miramonte has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 3.2% in Graceville.
Demographics
Demographics Graceville vs Miramonte provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Graceville | Miramonte |
---|---|---|
Black | 32 | Data is updating |
White | 59 | 90 |
Asian | 1 | 5 |
Hispanic | 6 | 5 |
Two or More Races | 2 | Data is updating |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Graceville vs Miramonte
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Graceville at 32% compared to 0% in Miramonte.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Miramonte at 90% compared to 59% in Graceville.
- In Miramonte, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 1% in Graceville.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Graceville at 6% compared to 5% in Miramonte.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Graceville at 2% compared to 0% in Miramonte.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Graceville and Miramonte at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Graceville | Miramonte |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.6% | Data is updating% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.2% | Data is updating% |
Depression | 22.2% | Data is updating% |
Smoking | 24.4% | Data is updating% |
Binge Drinking | 15.8% | Data is updating% |
Obesity | 33.6% | Data is updating% |
Disability Percentage | 18.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Graceville vs Miramonte
- More residents in Graceville report poor mental health at 18.6% compared to 0.0% in Miramonte.
- Depression is more prevalent in Graceville at 22.2% compared to 0.0% in Miramonte.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Graceville at 24.4% compared to 0.0% in Miramonte.
- Binge drinking is more common in Graceville at 15.8% compared to 0.0% in Miramonte.
- Obesity rates are higher in Graceville at 33.6% compared to 0.0% in Miramonte.
- Disability percentages are higher in Graceville at 18.0% compared to 0.0% in Miramonte.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Graceville | Miramonte |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.7% (58) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 25.3% (550) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Less than High School | 22.5% (490) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.2% (331) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Graceville vs Miramonte
- A higher percentage of residents in Graceville have no formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 0.0% in Miramonte.
- A higher percentage of residents in Graceville hold a high school diploma at 25.3% compared to 0.0% in Miramonte.
- More residents in Graceville have less than a high school education at 22.5% compared to 0.0% in Miramonte.
- A higher percentage of residents in Graceville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.2% compared to 0.0% in Miramonte.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.