Demographics details for Graceville, FL vs Cranston, RI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Graceville, FL vs Cranston, RI.
| Data | Graceville | Cranston |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,175 | 82,421 |
| Median Age | 31.7 years | 39.9 years |
| Median Income | $36,625 | $83,123 |
| Married Families | 41.0% | 37.0% |
| Poverty Level | 18% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Graceville vs Cranston
- The population in Cranston is higher at 82,421, compared to 2,175 in Graceville.
- The median age in Cranston is higher at 39.9 years, compared to 31.7 years in Graceville.
- Cranston has a higher median income of $83,123, compared to $36,625 in Graceville.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Graceville at 41.0% compared to 37.0% in Cranston.
- Graceville has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 8% in Cranston.
- Cranston has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.2% in Graceville.
Demographics
Demographics Graceville vs Cranston provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Graceville | Cranston |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 32 | 5 |
| White | 59 | 61 |
| Asian | 1 | 7 |
| Hispanic | 6 | 18 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 9 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Graceville vs Cranston
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Graceville at 32% compared to 5% in Cranston.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Cranston at 61% compared to 59% in Graceville.
- In Cranston, the Asian population stands at 7%, greater than 1% in Graceville.
- Cranston has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 18%, compared to 6% in Graceville.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Cranston at 9%, compared to 2% in Graceville.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Graceville and Cranston at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Graceville | Cranston |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.6% | 15.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.2% | 9.7% |
| Depression | 22.2% | 24.9% |
| Smoking | 24.4% | 13.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.8% | 18.6% |
| Obesity | 33.6% | 29.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Graceville vs Cranston
- More residents in Graceville report poor mental health at 18.6% compared to 15.1% in Cranston.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Cranston at 24.9% versus 22.2% in Graceville.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Graceville at 24.4% compared to 13.5% in Cranston.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Cranston at 18.6% compared to 15.8% in Graceville.
- Obesity rates are higher in Graceville at 33.6% compared to 29.8% in Cranston.
- Disability percentages are higher in Graceville at 18.0% compared to 12.0% in Cranston.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Graceville | Cranston |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.7% (58) | 1.1% (930) |
| High School Diploma | 25.3% (550) | 16.1% (13,246) |
| Less than High School | 22.5% (490) | 13.4% (11,048) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.2% (331) | 24.7% (20,330) |
Education Levels Comparison: Graceville vs Cranston
- A higher percentage of residents in Graceville have no formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 1.1% in Cranston.
- A higher percentage of residents in Graceville hold a high school diploma at 25.3% compared to 16.1% in Cranston.
- More residents in Graceville have less than a high school education at 22.5% compared to 13.4% in Cranston.
- In Cranston, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.7% compared to 15.2% in Graceville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.