Demographics details for Graceville, FL vs Central square, NY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Graceville, FL vs Central square, NY.
| Data | Graceville | Central square |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,175 | 1,852 |
| Median Age | 31.7 years | 41.0 years |
| Median Income | $36,625 | $58,824 |
| Married Families | 41.0% | 45.0% |
| Poverty Level | 18% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Graceville vs Central square
- In Graceville, the population is higher at 2,175, compared to 1,852 in Central square.
- The median age in Central square is higher at 41.0 years, compared to 31.7 years in Graceville.
- Central square has a higher median income of $58,824, compared to $36,625 in Graceville.
- In Central square, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 41.0% in Graceville.
- Graceville has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 8% in Central square.
- Central square has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.2% in Graceville.
Demographics
Demographics Graceville vs Central square provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Graceville | Central square |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 32 | 1 |
| White | 59 | 97 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 6 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 2 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Graceville vs Central square
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Graceville at 32% compared to 1% in Central square.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Central square at 97% compared to 59% in Graceville.
- The Asian population is larger in Graceville at 1% compared to 0% in Central square.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Graceville at 6% compared to 0% in Central square.
- Both Graceville and Central square have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 2%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Graceville and Central square at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Graceville | Central square |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.6% | 17.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.2% | 11.8% |
| Depression | 22.2% | 26.8% |
| Smoking | 24.4% | 21.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.8% | 19.3% |
| Obesity | 33.6% | 40.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Graceville vs Central square
- More residents in Graceville report poor mental health at 18.6% compared to 17.8% in Central square.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Central square at 26.8% versus 22.2% in Graceville.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Graceville at 24.4% compared to 21.2% in Central square.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Central square at 19.3% compared to 15.8% in Graceville.
- Central square has higher obesity rates at 40.3% compared to 33.6% in Graceville.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Graceville and Central square at 18.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Graceville | Central square |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.7% (58) | 0.1% (1) |
| High School Diploma | 25.3% (550) | 14.2% (263) |
| Less than High School | 22.5% (490) | 11.0% (204) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.2% (331) | 19.2% (356) |
Education Levels Comparison: Graceville vs Central square
- A higher percentage of residents in Graceville have no formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 0.1% in Central square.
- A higher percentage of residents in Graceville hold a high school diploma at 25.3% compared to 14.2% in Central square.
- More residents in Graceville have less than a high school education at 22.5% compared to 11.0% in Central square.
- In Central square, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.2% compared to 15.2% in Graceville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.