Demographics details for Graceville, FL vs Cedar hill, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Graceville, FL vs Cedar hill, TX.
| Data | Graceville | Cedar hill |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,175 | 48,341 |
| Median Age | 31.7 years | 35.3 years |
| Median Income | $36,625 | $84,132 |
| Married Families | 41.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 18% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 4.9 |
Population Comparison: Graceville vs Cedar hill
- The population in Cedar hill is higher at 48,341, compared to 2,175 in Graceville.
- The median age in Cedar hill is higher at 35.3 years, compared to 31.7 years in Graceville.
- Cedar hill has a higher median income of $84,132, compared to $36,625 in Graceville.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Graceville at 41.0% compared to 38.0% in Cedar hill.
- Graceville has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 9% in Cedar hill.
- Cedar hill has a higher unemployment rate at 4.9% compared to 3.2% in Graceville.
Demographics
Demographics Graceville vs Cedar hill provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Graceville | Cedar hill |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 32 | 51 |
| White | 59 | 11 |
| Asian | 1 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 6 | 27 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 9 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Graceville vs Cedar hill
- In Cedar hill, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 51% compared to 32% in Graceville.
- Graceville has a higher percentage of White residents at 59% compared to 11% in Cedar hill.
- In Cedar hill, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in Graceville.
- Cedar hill has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 27%, compared to 6% in Graceville.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Cedar hill at 9%, compared to 2% in Graceville.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Graceville and Cedar hill at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Graceville | Cedar hill |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.6% | 16.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.2% | 10.4% |
| Depression | 22.2% | 20.5% |
| Smoking | 24.4% | 14.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.8% | 17.7% |
| Obesity | 33.6% | 35.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Graceville vs Cedar hill
- More residents in Graceville report poor mental health at 18.6% compared to 16.1% in Cedar hill.
- Depression is more prevalent in Graceville at 22.2% compared to 20.5% in Cedar hill.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Graceville at 24.4% compared to 14.8% in Cedar hill.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Cedar hill at 17.7% compared to 15.8% in Graceville.
- Cedar hill has higher obesity rates at 35.9% compared to 33.6% in Graceville.
- Disability percentages are higher in Graceville at 18.0% compared to 11.0% in Cedar hill.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Graceville | Cedar hill |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.7% (58) | 1.2% (578) |
| High School Diploma | 25.3% (550) | 13.4% (6,465) |
| Less than High School | 22.5% (490) | 10.2% (4,909) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.2% (331) | 18.4% (8,890) |
Education Levels Comparison: Graceville vs Cedar hill
- A higher percentage of residents in Graceville have no formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 1.2% in Cedar hill.
- A higher percentage of residents in Graceville hold a high school diploma at 25.3% compared to 13.4% in Cedar hill.
- More residents in Graceville have less than a high school education at 22.5% compared to 10.2% in Cedar hill.
- In Cedar hill, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.4% compared to 15.2% in Graceville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.