Demographics details for Graceville, FL vs Blytheville, AR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Graceville, FL vs Blytheville, AR.
Data | Graceville | Blytheville |
---|---|---|
Population | 2,175 | 12,706 |
Median Age | 31.7 years | 38.1 years |
Median Income | $36,625 | $45,746 |
Married Families | 41.0% | 33.0% |
Poverty Level | 18% | 21% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Graceville vs Blytheville
- The population in Blytheville is higher at 12,706, compared to 2,175 in Graceville.
- The median age in Blytheville is higher at 38.1 years, compared to 31.7 years in Graceville.
- Blytheville has a higher median income of $45,746, compared to $36,625 in Graceville.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Graceville at 41.0% compared to 33.0% in Blytheville.
- The poverty level is higher in Blytheville at 21%, compared to 18% in Graceville.
- Blytheville has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.2% in Graceville.
Demographics
Demographics Graceville vs Blytheville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Graceville | Blytheville |
---|---|---|
Black | 32 | 64 |
White | 59 | 29 |
Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 6 | 5 |
Two or More Races | 2 | 2 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Graceville vs Blytheville
- In Blytheville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 64% compared to 32% in Graceville.
- Graceville has a higher percentage of White residents at 59% compared to 29% in Blytheville.
- The Asian population is larger in Graceville at 1% compared to 0% in Blytheville.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Graceville at 6% compared to 5% in Blytheville.
- Both Graceville and Blytheville have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 2%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Graceville and Blytheville at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Graceville | Blytheville |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.6% | 20.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.2% | 16.0% |
Depression | 22.2% | 24.9% |
Smoking | 24.4% | 26.3% |
Binge Drinking | 15.8% | 12.2% |
Obesity | 33.6% | 42.0% |
Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Graceville vs Blytheville
- In Blytheville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.8% compared to 18.6% in Graceville.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Blytheville at 24.9% versus 22.2% in Graceville.
- Blytheville has a higher smoking rate at 26.3% compared to 24.4% in Graceville.
- Binge drinking is more common in Graceville at 15.8% compared to 12.2% in Blytheville.
- Blytheville has higher obesity rates at 42.0% compared to 33.6% in Graceville.
- Disability percentages are higher in Graceville at 18.0% compared to 15.0% in Blytheville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Graceville | Blytheville |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.7% (58) | 1.0% (133) |
High School Diploma | 25.3% (550) | 24.0% (3,051) |
Less than High School | 22.5% (490) | 12.5% (1,585) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.2% (331) | 10.6% (1,349) |
Education Levels Comparison: Graceville vs Blytheville
- A higher percentage of residents in Graceville have no formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 1.0% in Blytheville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Graceville hold a high school diploma at 25.3% compared to 24.0% in Blytheville.
- More residents in Graceville have less than a high school education at 22.5% compared to 12.5% in Blytheville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Graceville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.2% compared to 10.6% in Blytheville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.