Demographics details for Gouldsboro, PA vs Sterling, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Gouldsboro, PA vs Sterling, IL.
| Data | Gouldsboro | Sterling |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 720 | 14,566 |
| Median Age | 49.8 years | 43.0 years |
| Median Income | $50,938 | $49,007 |
| Married Families | 48.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Gouldsboro vs Sterling
- The population in Sterling is higher at 14,566, compared to 720 in Gouldsboro.
- Residents in Gouldsboro have a higher median age of 49.8 years compared to 43.0 years in Sterling.
- Gouldsboro has a higher median income of $50,938 compared to $49,007 in Sterling.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Gouldsboro at 48.0% compared to 32.0% in Sterling.
- The poverty level is higher in Sterling at 12%, compared to 5% in Gouldsboro.
- Sterling has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.2% in Gouldsboro.
Demographics
Demographics Gouldsboro vs Sterling provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Gouldsboro | Sterling |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 2 |
| White | 93 | 56 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 27 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 12 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Gouldsboro vs Sterling
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Gouldsboro and Sterling at 2%.
- Gouldsboro has a higher percentage of White residents at 93% compared to 56% in Sterling.
- In Sterling, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Gouldsboro.
- Sterling has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 27%, compared to 3% in Gouldsboro.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Sterling at 12%, compared to 2% in Gouldsboro.
- In Sterling, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Gouldsboro.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Gouldsboro | Sterling |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.7% | 16.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.3% | 12.2% |
| Depression | 22.7% | 22.2% |
| Smoking | 18.7% | 18.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.2% | 17.4% |
| Obesity | 32.8% | 39.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 21.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Gouldsboro vs Sterling
- Poor mental health levels are equal in both Gouldsboro and Sterling at 16.7%.
- Depression is more prevalent in Gouldsboro at 22.7% compared to 22.2% in Sterling.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Gouldsboro at 18.7% compared to 18.6% in Sterling.
- Binge drinking is more common in Gouldsboro at 19.2% compared to 17.4% in Sterling.
- Sterling has higher obesity rates at 39.5% compared to 32.8% in Gouldsboro.
- Disability percentages are higher in Gouldsboro at 21.0% compared to 17.0% in Sterling.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Gouldsboro | Sterling |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.4% (10) | 1.1% (164) |
| High School Diploma | 23.2% (167) | 24.1% (3,511) |
| Less than High School | 6.4% (46) | 13.8% (2,012) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 20.8% (150) | 11.8% (1,713) |
Education Levels Comparison: Gouldsboro vs Sterling
- A higher percentage of residents in Gouldsboro have no formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 1.1% in Sterling.
- In Sterling, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.1% compared to 23.2% in Gouldsboro.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Sterling at 13.8%, compared to 6.4% in Gouldsboro.
- A higher percentage of residents in Gouldsboro hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.8% compared to 11.8% in Sterling.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.