Demographics details for Gouldsboro, PA vs Freeland, MI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Gouldsboro, PA vs Freeland, MI.
| Data | Gouldsboro | Freeland |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 720 | 7,357 |
| Median Age | 49.8 years | 37.4 years |
| Median Income | $50,938 | $95,478 |
| Married Families | 48.0% | 39.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 4% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Gouldsboro vs Freeland
- The population in Freeland is higher at 7,357, compared to 720 in Gouldsboro.
- Residents in Gouldsboro have a higher median age of 49.8 years compared to 37.4 years in Freeland.
- Freeland has a higher median income of $95,478, compared to $50,938 in Gouldsboro.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Gouldsboro at 48.0% compared to 39.0% in Freeland.
- Gouldsboro has a higher poverty level at 5% compared to 4% in Freeland.
- Freeland has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.2% in Gouldsboro.
Demographics
Demographics Gouldsboro vs Freeland provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Gouldsboro | Freeland |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 9 |
| White | 93 | 76 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 8 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Gouldsboro vs Freeland
- In Freeland, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 9% compared to 2% in Gouldsboro.
- Gouldsboro has a higher percentage of White residents at 93% compared to 76% in Freeland.
- In Freeland, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Gouldsboro.
- Freeland has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 3% in Gouldsboro.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Freeland at 8%, compared to 2% in Gouldsboro.
- In Freeland, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Gouldsboro.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Gouldsboro | Freeland |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.7% | 14.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.3% | 9.1% |
| Depression | 22.7% | 20.4% |
| Smoking | 18.7% | 14.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.2% | 20.3% |
| Obesity | 32.8% | 37.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 21.0% | 4.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Gouldsboro vs Freeland
- More residents in Gouldsboro report poor mental health at 16.7% compared to 14.5% in Freeland.
- Depression is more prevalent in Gouldsboro at 22.7% compared to 20.4% in Freeland.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Gouldsboro at 18.7% compared to 14.2% in Freeland.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Freeland at 20.3% compared to 19.2% in Gouldsboro.
- Freeland has higher obesity rates at 37.8% compared to 32.8% in Gouldsboro.
- Disability percentages are higher in Gouldsboro at 21.0% compared to 4.0% in Freeland.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Gouldsboro | Freeland |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.4% (10) | 0.7% (51) |
| High School Diploma | 23.2% (167) | 13.8% (1,014) |
| Less than High School | 6.4% (46) | 7.4% (542) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 20.8% (150) | 21.8% (1,605) |
Education Levels Comparison: Gouldsboro vs Freeland
- A higher percentage of residents in Gouldsboro have no formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.7% in Freeland.
- A higher percentage of residents in Gouldsboro hold a high school diploma at 23.2% compared to 13.8% in Freeland.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Freeland at 7.4%, compared to 6.4% in Gouldsboro.
- In Freeland, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.8% compared to 20.8% in Gouldsboro.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.